Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E117 Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

An AEM Sites implementation is migrating from on-premise to AEM as a Cloud Service. Previously, the application was deployed in a single package for both code and access policy nodes. After initial deployment and testing in the new infrastructure, it is reported that user permissions are not working as expected.What change should the Architect make to address this issue?
A) Update package metadata to use MergePreserve for handling access policy nodes
B) Move access policy nodes to a dedicated package and install manually
C) Refactor access policy nodes to Apache Sling JCR Repoinit scripts in the same package
D) Document permissions and request the Customer Success Engineer to configure

Adobe AD0-E117 Exam - Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E117 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E117 Questions]

An AEM Sites implementation is migrating from on-premise to AEM as a Cloud Service. Previously, the application was deployed in a single package for both code and access policy nodes. After initial deployment and testing in the new infrastructure, it is reported that user permissions are not working as expected.

What change should the Architect make to address this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Gladys at May 27, 2022, 12:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E117 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cecily
10 months ago
Isn't it a bit odd that permissions are messed up after migration?
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
11 months ago
Option A could work too, but I prefer B for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
11 months ago
Wait, why would we need to move them manually? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
11 months ago
Totally agree with B, makes sense to separate them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
11 months ago
I think option B is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
11 months ago
I think documenting permissions and involving the Customer Success Engineer is a good fallback, but it feels like we should be able to resolve this ourselves with the right package setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
11 months ago
I feel like refactoring access policy nodes to JCR Repoinit scripts could be a good solution, but I’m not entirely confident if that’s the best practice for this migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the MergePreserve option. I think we covered it, but I can't recall if it applies to access policies in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of handling access policy nodes separately during our last practice session. It seems like option B might be the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
12 months ago
Engaging people in change is definitely not simple and routine. There are a lot of complexities to navigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
12 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'd go with option B and deploy the app using Microsoft Intune. That way, we can ensure availability and track the devices, which meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
12 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about port redirection, where an attacker forwards traffic from one port to another on the same host.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel