Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACSM Exam 010-111 Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACSM's 010-111 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 2
[All 010-111 Questions]

The changes in muscle size associated with long-term resistance training is most likely due to increases in _____.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Yuki at Aug 10, 2023, 08:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 010-111 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Skye
1 months ago
I bet the person who wrote this question has never even lifted a dumbbell in their life. Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
2 days ago
No way, it's all about the size of the fibers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
3 days ago
B) Muscle fiber number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
14 days ago
Definitely, that's what leads to muscle growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
1 months ago
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marcelle
2 months ago
Ha! Connective tissue thickness? Come on, that's gotta be a joke. I'm going with A.
upvoted 0 times
Ben
17 days ago
User 3: Definitely, that's why we see muscle growth with consistent training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
27 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I think so too. It makes sense that resistance training would increase muscle fiber size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter is the most likely reason for muscle size changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleonore
2 months ago
Option D? Really? I guess the muscle hydration state could play a role, but that seems like the least likely answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Victor
5 days ago
Yeah, I agree. That seems like the most likely answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
6 days ago
I think A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
8 days ago
C) Connective tissue thickness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
9 days ago
B) Muscle fiber number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
10 days ago
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
11 days ago
Yeah, I agree. That seems like the most likely answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
15 days ago
I think A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
19 days ago
C) Connective tissue thickness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 months ago
B) Muscle fiber number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
2 months ago
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilburn
3 months ago
I was thinking B, but now I'm not so sure. Hmm, this is a tricky one.
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
1 months ago
C) Connective tissue thickness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
2 months ago
I think A makes more sense. It's all about the size of the muscle fibers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
2 months ago
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
3 months ago
Definitely option A! The increase in muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter is the primary reason for muscle growth in resistance training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Hydration state of the muscle, as water content can affect muscle size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
3 months ago
I agree with Jackie, because when we lift weights, our muscle fibers get bigger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel