Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACSM 010-111 Exam - Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

The changes in muscle size associated with long-term resistance training is most likely due to increases in _____.
D) Hydration state of the muscle.
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
B) Muscle fiber number.
C) Connective tissue thickness.

ACSM 010-111 Exam - Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACSM's 010-111 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 2
[All 010-111 Questions]

The changes in muscle size associated with long-term resistance training is most likely due to increases in _____.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Yuki at Aug 10, 2023, 08:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 010-111 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leatha
8 months ago
Connective tissue thickness could play a role, but A seems right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not just about hydration?
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
8 months ago
A makes the most sense, I've read that too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
8 months ago
I thought it was B, more fibers means bigger muscles, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
9 months ago
Definitely A, muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
India
9 months ago
I keep second-guessing myself. Could it be C about connective tissue thickness? I remember it being mentioned, but I'm not confident it’s the main reason for size changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
9 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question on this! I think it was about how resistance training primarily affects the size of muscle fibers, so maybe A is right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
9 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. I remember something about muscle fiber number increasing too, but I can't recall if that's the main factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
9 months ago
I think the answer is A, muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter. We talked about hypertrophy in class, and that seems to fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
9 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the requirements for supporting FC protocol on the Nexus 93180YC-FX switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
9 months ago
D is definitely the way to go here. Renaming the error log file and then flushing the logs is the most straightforward and reliable method for rotating the error log. I feel pretty good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem pretty straightforward, but I can't quite remember if Walls is an available element category for the Copy/Monitor tool. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
10 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The exhibit shows some IP addresses, but I'm not sure how to determine which one is the correct SPF record. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
1 year ago
I bet the person who wrote this question has never even lifted a dumbbell in their life. Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
1 year ago
No way, it's all about the size of the fibers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
B) Muscle fiber number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
1 year ago
Definitely, that's what leads to muscle growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
1 year ago
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marcelle
1 year ago
Ha! Connective tissue thickness? Come on, that's gotta be a joke. I'm going with A.
upvoted 0 times
Ben
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, that's why we see muscle growth with consistent training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I think so too. It makes sense that resistance training would increase muscle fiber size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter is the most likely reason for muscle size changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleonore
1 year ago
Option D? Really? I guess the muscle hydration state could play a role, but that seems like the least likely answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Victor
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. That seems like the most likely answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
1 year ago
I think A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
1 year ago
C) Connective tissue thickness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
1 year ago
B) Muscle fiber number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
1 year ago
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. That seems like the most likely answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
1 year ago
I think A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
C) Connective tissue thickness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 year ago
B) Muscle fiber number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilburn
1 year ago
I was thinking B, but now I'm not so sure. Hmm, this is a tricky one.
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
1 year ago
C) Connective tissue thickness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
1 year ago
I think A makes more sense. It's all about the size of the muscle fibers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
1 year ago
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
1 year ago
Definitely option A! The increase in muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter is the primary reason for muscle growth in resistance training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Hydration state of the muscle, as water content can affect muscle size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
1 year ago
I agree with Jackie, because when we lift weights, our muscle fibers get bigger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel