Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACSM 010-111 Exam - Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion

Posted by Yuki on Aug 10, 2023 at 08:23 PM

The changes in muscle size associated with long-term resistance training is most likely due to increases in _____.

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium 010-111 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
LE
Leatha 11 months ago
Connective tissue thickness could play a role, but A seems right.
SH
Shawn 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not just about hydration?
DO
Douglass 11 months ago
A makes the most sense, I've read that too!
GE
Genevive 11 months ago
I thought it was B, more fibers means bigger muscles, right?
CO
Colette 12 months ago
Definitely A, muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter is key!
IN
India 12 months ago
I keep second-guessing myself. Could it be C about connective tissue thickness? I remember it being mentioned, but I'm not confident it’s the main reason for size changes.
LO
Lorenza 12 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question on this! I think it was about how resistance training primarily affects the size of muscle fibers, so maybe A is right?
RO
Rosamond 1 year ago
I'm not so sure about that. I remember something about muscle fiber number increasing too, but I can't recall if that's the main factor.
YU
Yuonne 1 year ago
I think the answer is A, muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter. We talked about hypertrophy in class, and that seems to fit.
HA
Haydee 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the requirements for supporting FC protocol on the Nexus 93180YC-FX switch.
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
D is definitely the way to go here. Renaming the error log file and then flushing the logs is the most straightforward and reliable method for rotating the error log. I feel pretty good about this one.
WE
Weldon 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem pretty straightforward, but I can't quite remember if Walls is an available element category for the Copy/Monitor tool. I'll have to think this through carefully.
AR
Arlen 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The exhibit shows some IP addresses, but I'm not sure how to determine which one is the correct SPF record. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully.
SK
Skye 1 year ago
I bet the person who wrote this question has never even lifted a dumbbell in their life. Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter, no doubt about it.
AV
Avery 1 year ago
↳ replying to Skye
No way, it's all about the size of the fibers.
LI
Lindsey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Skye
B) Muscle fiber number.
BR
Brice 1 year ago
↳ replying to Skye
Definitely, that's what leads to muscle growth.
LA
Lashawna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Skye
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
MA
Marcelle 1 year ago
Ha! Connective tissue thickness? Come on, that's gotta be a joke. I'm going with A.
BE
Ben 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marcelle
User 3: Definitely, that's why we see muscle growth with consistent training.
JA
Janey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marcelle
User 2: Yeah, I think so too. It makes sense that resistance training would increase muscle fiber size.
LO
Louis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marcelle
User 1: I agree, A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter is the most likely reason for muscle size changes.
EL
Eleonore 1 year ago
Option D? Really? I guess the muscle hydration state could play a role, but that seems like the least likely answer here.
VI
Victor 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
Yeah, I agree. That seems like the most likely answer.
TO
Tony 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
I think A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter makes more sense.
JE
Jettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
C) Connective tissue thickness.
AN
Annette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
B) Muscle fiber number.
KA
Karan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
LA
Lasandra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
Yeah, I agree. That seems like the most likely answer.
JE
Jessenia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
I think A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter makes more sense.
NA
Natalya 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
C) Connective tissue thickness.
DO
Dorthy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
B) Muscle fiber number.
CL
Clay 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eleonore
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
WI
Wilburn 1 year ago
I was thinking B, but now I'm not so sure. Hmm, this is a tricky one.
KI
Kirk 1 year ago
↳ replying to Wilburn
C) Connective tissue thickness.
TU
Tula 1 year ago
↳ replying to Wilburn
I think A makes more sense. It's all about the size of the muscle fibers.
SA
Sabra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Wilburn
A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
WI
Willodean 1 year ago
Definitely option A! The increase in muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter is the primary reason for muscle growth in resistance training.
LI
Lilli 1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Hydration state of the muscle, as water content can affect muscle size.
JO
Joseph 2 years ago
I agree with Jackie, because when we lift weights, our muscle fibers get bigger.
JA
Jackie 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Muscle fiber cross-sectional diameter.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel