Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE Exam - Topic 1 Question 59 Discussion

Multiple cashiers operate from a single cash drawer without separate access codes is a red flag for:
B) Disbursement scheme
A) Fraudulent scheme
C) Register scheme
D) Force inventory scheme

ACFE CFE Exam - Topic 1 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 1
[All CFE Questions]

Multiple cashiers operate from a single cash drawer without separate access codes is a red flag for:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Kenneth at Jul 13, 2024, 08:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Whitley
9 months ago
Totally agree, it's a huge red flag!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure this isn't just a management issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
10 months ago
Seems like a register scheme to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
10 months ago
I think it's more about disbursement schemes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
10 months ago
That's definitely a fraud risk!
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think it could also be linked to inventory issues, though that seems less likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it pointed towards a register scheme because of the lack of access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think this situation could relate to a disbursement scheme since it involves cash handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
11 months ago
I remember discussing how multiple cashiers sharing a drawer can lead to accountability issues, which might hint at a fraudulent scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the options here. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and think through the different types of schemes that could be involved with a shared cash drawer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
11 months ago
I'm confident the answer is A - fraudulent scheme. Multiple cashiers accessing the same drawer creates an opportunity for theft or manipulation of the cash.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
11 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. A shared cash drawer without separate access codes could enable employees to potentially misappropriate funds, so I'll go with the fraudulent scheme option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about internal controls. I'll focus on identifying the key red flag mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the different types of schemes and which one would be most likely with a shared cash drawer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
11 months ago
Wait, I'm confused. I thought the audit committee was responsible for overseeing internal controls. I'll have to double-check my notes on this topic before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
11 months ago
Based on the options, it seems like the feature allows for copying lot attributes either from child to parent, or between child lots. I'll need to carefully read each option to determine the two true statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 year ago
Option A, no doubt. Sharing a cash drawer? That's like handing the keys to the candy store to a bunch of kids. Recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
Ha! I bet the auditors are having a field day with this one. Might as well call it the 'Steal Everything in Sight' scheme.
upvoted 0 times
Dallas
1 year ago
This setup could easily lead to a force inventory scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 year ago
D) Force inventory scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
1 year ago
Seems like they're setting up for a register scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
1 year ago
C) Register scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 year ago
It's like an invitation for disbursement scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
1 year ago
B) Disbursement scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 year ago
Definitely a red flag for fraudulent scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 year ago
A) Fraudulent scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iraida
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say it's a register scheme. Seems like they're trying to cover their tracks with that shared cash drawer setup.
upvoted 0 times
Pedro
1 year ago
C) Register scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
1 year ago
I think it's more likely a register scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
1 year ago
A) Fraudulent scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nu
1 year ago
I'm going with A. Separate access codes are crucial for accountability. This is a classic red flag for potential fraud.
upvoted 0 times
Juan
1 year ago
C) Register scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 year ago
I agree, separate access codes are important for accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 year ago
A) Fraudulent scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelle
1 year ago
Definitely a fraudulent scheme. All those cashiers sharing the same drawer? Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Ellen
1 year ago
No, I think it's more likely a fraudulent scheme with shared access to the cash drawer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
B) Disbursement scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
1 year ago
I agree, definitely a red flag for fraudulent activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
1 year ago
A) Fraudulent scheme
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaun
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be C) Register scheme, since it involves manipulating the register to steal money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 year ago
I agree with Naomi, because multiple cashiers sharing a cash drawer can make it easier to cover up fraudulent activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 year ago
I think it's A) Fraudulent scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel