Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE CFE Exam - Topic 1 Question 59 Discussion

Posted by Kenneth on Jul 13, 2024 at 08:06 PM

Multiple cashiers operate from a single cash drawer without separate access codes is a red flag for:

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium CFE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
WH
Whitley 11 months ago
Totally agree, it's a huge red flag!
LA
Laurena 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure this isn't just a management issue?
CO
Corrie 11 months ago
Seems like a register scheme to me.
VI
Viola 12 months ago
I think it's more about disbursement schemes.
AL
Allene 12 months ago
That's definitely a fraud risk!
TA
Talia 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think it could also be linked to inventory issues, though that seems less likely.
LA
Lavonna 1 year ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it pointed towards a register scheme because of the lack of access control.
BE
Belen 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think this situation could relate to a disbursement scheme since it involves cash handling.
TE
Tennie 1 year ago
I remember discussing how multiple cashiers sharing a drawer can lead to accountability issues, which might hint at a fraudulent scheme.
DE
Deangelo 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the options here. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and think through the different types of schemes that could be involved with a shared cash drawer.
LE
Leanna 1 year ago
I'm confident the answer is A - fraudulent scheme. Multiple cashiers accessing the same drawer creates an opportunity for theft or manipulation of the cash.
AR
Arlen 1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down. A shared cash drawer without separate access codes could enable employees to potentially misappropriate funds, so I'll go with the fraudulent scheme option.
CA
Caitlin 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about internal controls. I'll focus on identifying the key red flag mentioned in the question.
AI
Aide 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the different types of schemes and which one would be most likely with a shared cash drawer.
KA
Kassandra 1 year ago
Wait, I'm confused. I thought the audit committee was responsible for overseeing internal controls. I'll have to double-check my notes on this topic before answering.
DE
Desire 1 year ago
Based on the options, it seems like the feature allows for copying lot attributes either from child to parent, or between child lots. I'll need to carefully read each option to determine the two true statements.
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
Option A, no doubt. Sharing a cash drawer? That's like handing the keys to the candy store to a bunch of kids. Recipe for disaster.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
Ha! I bet the auditors are having a field day with this one. Might as well call it the 'Steal Everything in Sight' scheme.
DA
Dallas 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
This setup could easily lead to a force inventory scheme.
RO
Rozella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
D) Force inventory scheme
AL
Alline 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
Seems like they're setting up for a register scheme.
CH
Charolette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
C) Register scheme
SA
Salena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
It's like an invitation for disbursement scheme.
TA
Tawna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
B) Disbursement scheme
AR
Ardella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
Definitely a red flag for fraudulent scheme.
DE
Dean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Glory
A) Fraudulent scheme
IR
Iraida 1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say it's a register scheme. Seems like they're trying to cover their tracks with that shared cash drawer setup.
PE
Pedro 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iraida
C) Register scheme
MA
Maxima 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iraida
I think it's more likely a register scheme.
SH
Shelia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Iraida
A) Fraudulent scheme
NU
Nu 1 year ago
I'm going with A. Separate access codes are crucial for accountability. This is a classic red flag for potential fraud.
JU
Juan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nu
C) Register scheme
RE
Rebbecca 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nu
I agree, separate access codes are important for accountability.
TE
Terrilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nu
A) Fraudulent scheme
AD
Adelle 2 years ago
Definitely a fraudulent scheme. All those cashiers sharing the same drawer? Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
EL
Ellen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adelle
No, I think it's more likely a fraudulent scheme with shared access to the cash drawer.
CL
Claudio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adelle
B) Disbursement scheme
AN
Anisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adelle
I agree, definitely a red flag for fraudulent activity.
DA
Danilo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adelle
A) Fraudulent scheme
SH
Shaun 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be C) Register scheme, since it involves manipulating the register to steal money.
AL
Alesia 2 years ago
I agree with Naomi, because multiple cashiers sharing a cash drawer can make it easier to cover up fraudulent activities.
NA
Naomi 2 years ago
I think it's A) Fraudulent scheme.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel