Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE CFE-Law Exam - Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Posted by Nydia on Nov 18, 2024 at 11:32 AM

Which of the following statements concerning civil trials in common law jurisdictions is MOST ACCURATE?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium CFE-Law Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
CE
Celestine 11 months ago
Really? I didn't know the standard of proof was different in civil trials.
RI
Ricki 11 months ago
No way, B can't be true! You can appeal in civil cases.
TA
Tamie 11 months ago
A is misleading; civil juries can have fewer jurors.
JO
Johnson 12 months ago
I thought jury verdicts had to be unanimous too!
EL
Elizabeth 12 months ago
D is definitely the right answer.
LA
Lashon 12 months ago
I recall something about jury verdicts in civil trials not needing to be unanimous, but I can't remember the exact details.
TI
Tina 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the appeal process in civil cases. I thought both sides could appeal, but maybe I misread that in my notes?
ER
Erick 1 year ago
I practiced a question about the standard of proof in civil cases, and I believe it's the preponderance of the evidence, which seems to fit with option D.
LE
Lettie 1 year ago
I think I remember that civil jury trials don't necessarily have the same number of jurors as criminal ones, but I'm not completely sure.
JO
Joaquin 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about the specifics here. I'll try to eliminate the options that I know are incorrect, and then make an educated guess on the best answer.
RE
Refugia 1 year ago
I've got a good handle on this topic. The most accurate statement is that in most civil cases, the standard of proof is the preponderance of the evidence, so I'm going with D.
ST
Stefany 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between civil and criminal jury trials. I'll need to double-check my notes to make sure I have the right information before answering this.
SH
Shawnda 1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. I'm pretty sure the standard of proof in civil cases is the preponderance of the evidence, so I'll go with option D.
DY
Dyan 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through what I know about civil trials in common law jurisdictions.
SH
Shala 2 years ago
I feel like I learned this in my high school civics class. How could anyone not know the standard of proof in civil cases is preponderance of evidence? That's like Civil Trials 101.
SH
Shawn 2 years ago
Haha, imagine if civil juries had to be the same size as criminal juries. Can you imagine 12 people trying to agree on a slip and fall case? That would be a circus!
VI
Viola 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shawn
D) in most civil cases, the standard of proof is the preponderance of the evidence
LE
Lezlie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shawn
Haha, I can't even imagine trying to get 12 people to agree on something like that!
RO
Robt 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shawn
A) Civil jury trials must have the same number of jurors as in criminal jury trials.
CH
Cherrie 2 years ago
This is a trick question. A, B, and C are all false, so D has to be the correct answer. These civil trial rules are pretty basic stuff.
NA
Nana 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure neither side can appeal an adverse judgment in a civil case. Isn't that the whole point of a civil trial, to get a final resolution without endless appeals?
AN
Anthony 2 years ago
↳ replying to Nana
I'm pretty sure neither side can appeal an adverse judgment in a civil case.
MA
Malcolm 2 years ago
↳ replying to Nana
I believe jury verdicts in civil trials must always be unanimous.
RU
Rusty 2 years ago
↳ replying to Nana
Actually, civil jury trials must have the same number of jurors as in criminal jury trials.
TA
Tamar 2 years ago
↳ replying to Nana
I think in most civil cases, the standard of proof is the preponderance of the evidence.
MO
Monroe 2 years ago
I thought civil jury trials didn't have to be unanimous. Isn't that one of the key differences between civil and criminal cases?
AL
Alica 2 years ago
D sounds about right. In civil cases, the standard of proof is usually the preponderance of evidence, not the higher 'beyond reasonable doubt' standard used in criminal trials.
CA
Carissa 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alica
No, it doesn't have to be unanimous like in criminal cases.
FE
Fernanda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alica
So in civil jury trials, the verdict doesn't have to be unanimous?
LI
Lilli 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alica
That makes sense, it's a lower standard than in criminal cases.
UL
Ulysses 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alica
I agree, in civil cases, the standard of proof is usually the preponderance of evidence.
VA
Van 2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it might be C) Jury verdicts in civil trials must always be unanimous.
PO
Portia 2 years ago
I agree with Kerry. The preponderance of the evidence is the standard in civil cases.
KE
Kerry 2 years ago
I think the answer is D) in most civil cases, the standard of proof is the preponderance of the evidence.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel