Which of the following statements concerning judgments involving parties that are in multiple jurisdictions is MOST ACCURATE?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CFE-Law Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
KY
Kyoko
3 months ago
B makes sense too, but it’s too narrow. D covers more ground.
TR
Trina
3 months ago
I feel like A is misleading. It's not automatic everywhere.
TE
Temeka
3 months ago
I think D is the best choice. Treaties matter a lot.
LE
Lelia
4 months ago
Wait, are you saying a judgment can be ignored in some places?
SH
Shawnta
4 months ago
Option D seems right to me.
GE
Gerald
4 months ago
I thought it was just about where the assets are...
HE
Helaine
5 months ago
Totally agree, enforcement treaties matter!
IV
Ivory
6 months ago
A foreign judgment isn't automatically enforceable everywhere.
LA
Laurel
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I recall that just having a judgment doesn’t guarantee enforcement everywhere.
BE
Ben
7 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question similar to this before, and I think it was about how judgments are enforced based on asset location.
JE
Jettie
7 months ago
I think option D sounds right because we talked about enforcement treaties in class, but I’m a bit confused about how they actually work.
MA
Maira
7 months ago
I remember discussing how enforcement of judgments can vary by jurisdiction, but I'm not sure if treaties are always a factor.