New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE CFE-Law Exam - Topic 3 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Law exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 3
[All CFE-Law Questions]

Company A used Company B to recover damages for the breach of a contract. In the same proceeding. Company B sought damages for an allegation that Company A fraudulently induced Company B into entering the contract. In this case, what would Company B's claim against Company A be called?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
France
12 days ago
Wait, is it really that straightforward?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
17 days ago
I thought it was a cross-claim at first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
22 days ago
Counterclaim, easy peasy. Though I do wonder if the person who wrote this question was trying to be a little too clever.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keith
27 days ago
Counterclaim, duh. This is like Law 101. Gotta love these easy questions on the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
1 month ago
Counterclaim makes the most sense. I can't imagine why anyone would think it's a Collateral attack or a Reversal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
1 month ago
I agree, Counterclaim is the correct answer. It's the most common way for the defendant to assert their own claims against the plaintiff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
1 month ago
The answer is clearly a Counterclaim. That's the standard legal term for when the defendant brings a claim against the plaintiff in the same proceeding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
2 months ago
I feel like collateral attack might be a term we discussed, but it doesn't seem to fit here. Counterclaim sounds more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question where a defendant filed a counterclaim, so I'm leaning towards A, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about cross-claims being related to claims against co-defendants. This seems different.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 months ago
I think Company B's claim would be called a counterclaim since they're responding to Company A's original claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
2 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is a counterclaim. Company B is asserting its own claim against Company A within the same lawsuit, rather than a separate collateral attack or cross-claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
Definitely a counterclaim! It fits the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
3 months ago
I think it's a counterclaim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
3 months ago
It's definitely a counterclaim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
3 months ago
Hmm, this is tricky. I'm leaning towards D) cross-claim since Company B's claim is against the other party in the same case, not a counterclaim against the original claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
3 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Company B is making a separate claim against Company A in the same proceeding, so I'm going to go with A) counterclaim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
3 months ago
I'm not sure, the question mentions "fraudulently induced" which makes me think it could be a collateral attack. But I'm not totally confident on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
4 months ago
I think this is a counterclaim. Company B is making a claim against Company A within the same proceeding.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel