I think option A sounds familiar because we discussed how an overt act is necessary for conspiracy, but I'm not completely sure if it has to be by one of the conspirators.
I'm a little unsure, but I'm going to go with A. The question is specifically asking about a legal element, so that seems like the most relevant answer.
I'm not totally confident on this, but I'm leaning towards A as the correct answer. The other options don't seem to match the legal requirements as well.
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the government just needs to show that one of the conspirators took some action, not that the overall purpose of the conspiracy was accomplished.
Fernanda
2 months agoChau
2 months agoElly
2 months agoShakira
3 months agoCamellia
3 months agoAnika
3 months agoJudy
4 months agoCiara
4 months agoHermila
4 months agoGraciela
4 months agoKenny
4 months agoInocencia
5 months agoFloyd
5 months agoJunita
5 months agoNathalie
5 months agoIsidra
6 months agoStarr
6 months agoNada
6 months agoPa
2 months agoJennie
2 months agoLasandra
3 months agoNakisha
3 months agoNathalie
6 months agoJoaquin
7 months agoChun
6 months agoMelina
6 months agoReuben
7 months agoZack
6 months ago