MENU
Nora, a health care provider b convicted of health care fraud in criminal court After her conviction, the national health agency begins a proceeding to prohibit Nora from seeking reimbursement from government health care programs for five years Which type of administrative penalty is the national health agency seeking?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CFE-Law Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
ST
Steffanie
11 months ago
Totally agree, it’s debarment for sure!
JA
Jacquelyne
11 months ago
Wait, five years? That seems harsh for just fraud!
FL
Flo
11 months ago
I think it’s just a temporary measure, so it’s probably license suspension.
BR
Brice
12 months ago
Definitely not license revocation, that's more permanent.
VI
Vivan
12 months ago
Sounds like debarment to me!
JU
Julieta
12 months ago
Disenfranchisement sounds familiar, but I don’t think it applies to health care programs. I’m leaning towards debarment too.
XE
Xenia
1 year ago
I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and it was about license revocation. But I’m not confident that fits here.
IN
India
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about license suspension being temporary, while debarment seems more permanent.
LY
Lyda
1 year ago
I think this might be about debarment since it specifically mentions prohibiting reimbursement from government programs.
MA
Marquetta
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the national health agency is seeking to prohibit Nora from seeking reimbursement from government health care programs for five years. That sounds like a debarment, which is an administrative penalty that excludes someone from participating in government programs. I'm confident that the answer is B, debarment.
RI
Ria
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions a criminal conviction, but the options seem to be focused on administrative penalties. I'll need to think through the relationship between the criminal conviction and the potential administrative actions the agency can take. Maybe I should review my notes on the differences between criminal and administrative penalties.
CA
Carma
1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. The question is asking about the type of administrative penalty the national health agency is seeking, and the options are license suspension, debarment, license revocation, and disenfranchisement. Based on the context, I think the answer is likely debarment, which is the exclusion of a person from participating in government programs.
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. It's not entirely clear to me how the criminal conviction relates to the administrative penalty the agency is seeking. I'll need to carefully read through the options and try to understand the differences between them before I can confidently select an answer.
TA
Tawna
1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The Triple Bottom Line is all about balancing social, environmental, and financial performance, so I'd say the two best answers are A and E - attracting ethical customers and cost savings.
LA
Lakeesha
1 year ago
Debarment is the correct answer. Although I have to admit, 'Disenfranchisement' does sound like a fun way to punish someone. Can we make that a thing?
RA
Rasheeda
1 year ago
C: I wonder what other creative penalties could be used in cases like this.
AN
Annett
1 year ago
B: Yeah, 'Disenfranchisement' does sound interesting.
GW
Gwenn
1 year ago
A: Debarment
TO
Tomoko
1 year ago
Debarment is the right answer. Although I'm a bit surprised they're not going for License Revocation - that's usually the go-to for fraud convictions. Maybe they're feeling generous today.
KA
Kasandra
2 years ago
Hmm, I wonder if Nora's fraud involved any 'creative accounting' or if she just straight-up fudged the numbers. Either way, Debarment seems like the appropriate punishment here.
HU
Hubert
1 year ago
I agree, Debarment seems fitting for Nora's actions.
EM
Emeline
1 year ago
D) Disenfranchisement
CA
Carmen
1 year ago
C) License revocation
JA
Jannette
1 year ago
B) Debarment
SE
Serina
1 year ago
She should've thought twice before committing fraud.
BR
Broderick
1 year ago
A) License suspension
LU
Luis
1 year ago
That's a serious penalty for sure.
ST
Starr
1 year ago
Yeah, she might face debarment from seeking reimbursement.
TY
Ty
1 year ago
I heard Nora got convicted of health care fraud.
HY
Hyman
2 years ago
The national health agency is seeking Debarment, which is the correct administrative penalty for a health care provider convicted of fraud. This will prevent Nora from receiving reimbursement from government health care programs for a specific period of time.
AN
Antonette
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think license revocation could also be a possible penalty in this case.
PA
Pauline
2 years ago
I agree with Bok, debarment seems like the appropriate penalty for health care fraud.
BO
Bok
2 years ago
I think the national health agency is seeking debarment.