MENU
The government filed a avil action against a politician for accepting real estate as a bribe. There is a possibility that the politician could transfer the real estate to a third party before the court enters a final judgment Which type of order should the government seek from the court to prevent the politician from transferring the real estate?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CFE-Law Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
23 comments · newest first
BI
Billy
3 days ago
Yeah, A prevents any transfer. Good call!
AU
Audra
8 days ago
I feel like the government needs to act fast. A is the best choice.
KE
Keneth
13 days ago
C could work, but A is more specific for this case.
PH
Phillip
18 days ago
But what about C) Prejudgment attachment? It sounds strong too.
NU
Nu
24 days ago
I agree, A makes sense. It keeps the property safe.
JU
Justine
29 days ago
Tough question! I think it's A) Preservation order.
TE
Tegan
1 month ago
I guess both options have their merits.
LI
Linwood
1 month ago
Exactly! We need to secure the asset first.
LA
Lamonica
1 month ago
It’s about preventing loss before judgment.
PO
Polly
2 months ago
True, but a preservation order is still a solid choice.
TE
Tegan
2 months ago
But what if the politician just hides it?
LI
Linwood
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards prejudgment attachment. It’s more direct.
LA
Lamonica
2 months ago
Definitely! It keeps the property safe.
PO
Polly
2 months ago
I think a preservation order makes sense.
BA
Barrett
3 months ago
Not sure if that's enough to prevent any sneaky moves.
AN
Annmarie
3 months ago
Totally agree with Preservation order! It's the best option here.
TU
Tuyet
3 months ago
Wait, can they really stop him from transferring it? Seems tricky.
SH
Sharee
3 months ago
Definitely A) Preservation order! Makes the most sense.
KA
Kate
3 months ago
The government should seek a preservation order to stop the transfer.
SH
Shaniqua
3 months ago
I feel like declaratory relief might not be strong enough in this situation. The government needs something more proactive, like a prejudgment attachment.
TR
Trina
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where a court issued a litigation hold. But I don't think that's the right term for stopping a transfer of property.
NA
Narcisa
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about preservation orders being used to keep evidence intact. Is that relevant here?
KR
Kristeen
4 months ago
I think the government should seek a prejudgment attachment to prevent the transfer. It seems like the most direct way to secure the property.