Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE CFE-Law Exam - Topic 1 Question 74 Discussion

Which of the following is NOT an element that is generally required to establish a claim alleging the common law civil wrong for intentional infliction of emotional distress?
B) The victim's distress occurred for at least two years.
A) The defendant acted intentionally or recklessly.
C) The defendant engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct.
D) The victim suffered distress due to the defendant's conduct.

ACFE CFE-Law Exam - Topic 1 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Law exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 1
[All CFE-Law Questions]

Which of the following is NOT an element that is generally required to establish a claim alleging the common law civil wrong for intentional infliction of emotional distress?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Sharika
4 days ago
Exactly! Two years is excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
9 days ago
Emotional distress can happen quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
15 days ago
Same here! B just doesn't fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
20 days ago
I feel confident about this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
25 days ago
A, C, and D are essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
1 month ago
Definitely not a requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
1 month ago
Yeah, two years seems too long.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 month ago
I think B is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
2 months ago
A, C, and D are the key elements for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
2 months ago
I thought distress had to be immediate, not long-term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
2 months ago
Wait, two years? That sounds excessive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
2 months ago
Totally agree, B seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
2 months ago
B is definitely not required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
2 months ago
I'm a bit uncertain about this one. I know the defendant has to act intentionally, but the two-year thing seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on the defendant's intent and the nature of their conduct. I think that might help here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
4 months ago
I think option B is the one that doesn't fit because I don't recall any requirement for the distress to last two years.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
4 months ago
I remember that to prove intentional infliction of emotional distress, the conduct has to be extreme and outrageous, but I'm not sure about the time frame for the distress.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel