MENU
Which of the following is TRUE in regard to authenticating evidence in most common law systems?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CFE-Law Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
LI
Lilli
12 months ago
Totally with you on C! Relevance doesn't matter if it can't be authenticated.
WA
Wade
12 months ago
A is incorrect. Witnesses can authenticate digital records if they have personal knowledge.
JU
Jutta
12 months ago
Wait, are you saying digital records can't be authenticated by witness testimony? That seems off.
JA
Jamal
1 year ago
I disagree with D. Authentication isn't just about hearsay.
LE
Leandro
1 year ago
C is definitely true! If you can't authenticate it, it won't get in.
AR
Artie
1 year ago
I thought the purpose of authentication was more about establishing the evidence's reliability rather than just preventing hearsay, so D seems off to me.
EL
Elliott
1 year ago
I recall that if evidence can’t be authenticated, it really won’t be admitted, which makes me think C might be the right answer.
DO
Dominic
1 year ago
I’m a bit unsure, but I think evidence doesn’t always need a jury to be authenticated. I feel like we practiced a question similar to this.
CH
Cheryl
1 year ago
I remember discussing how digital records can actually be authenticated by someone who has personal knowledge, so I think A is definitely not true.
KA
Kathrine
1 year ago
Based on the information provided, I think the best answer is option B - 1 EO for the Compliance application and 1 EI for the Laboratory Management application. The Compliance app is sending out data, and the Laboratory Management app is receiving and updating an ILF.
AM
Amie
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details before selecting an answer.
TA
Tamra
1 year ago
I remember that MySQL is great for structured data, so I think option A makes the most sense.