Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 4 Question 75 Discussion

Lisa, a fraud examiner at a private company, receives an anonymous call from a potential whistleblower. The whistleblower is hesitant to reveal their identity but will do so if it can be Kept fully confidential. Which of the following statements is MOST ACCURATE?
D) Lisa may promise the whistleblower full confidentiality, even if she knows her statement is untrue, because the lie is ultimately beneficial to her employer.
A) Lisa may offer the whistleblower full confidentiality because they are not a suspect
B) Lisa should explain that she will try her best to keep the whistleblower's identity confidential.
C) Lisa should state that she will not be able to keep the whistleblower's identity confidential because all information must be disclosed to management

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 4 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 4
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Lisa, a fraud examiner at a private company, receives an anonymous call from a potential whistleblower. The whistleblower is hesitant to reveal their identity but will do so if it can be Kept fully confidential. Which of the following statements is MOST ACCURATE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Helaine at Oct 20, 2023, 09:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Investigation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Art
9 months ago
B seems like the best option, honesty is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
10 months ago
I don't think she should promise anything she can't deliver.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
10 months ago
Wait, can she really keep it confidential at all?
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
10 months ago
Totally agree, she should explain her limitations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
10 months ago
Lisa can't guarantee full confidentiality, that's risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
10 months ago
I vaguely recall that offering full confidentiality can be risky, especially if management needs to know. I think option C sounds right, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether Lisa can promise confidentiality at all. I thought there were legal limits to what she could say.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
11 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where the examiner had to balance confidentiality and legal obligations. I feel like option B might be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
11 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of confidentiality in whistleblower cases, but I'm not sure if Lisa can guarantee it completely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
I think Option A is the right answer. The whistleblower is not a suspect, so the examiner should be able to offer them full confidentiality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
11 months ago
Option B seems like the safest approach. Promising full confidentiality when you can't guarantee it could get the examiner in trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the relevant laws and company policies on whistleblower confidentiality before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think about the ethical obligations of a fraud examiner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if this is open-ended or close-ended. I'll have to think carefully about how to structure my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
11 months ago
It feels like there was a practice question about access lists and subnets where this format confused me! I hope I pick the right one this time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
11 months ago
I think the answer might be SD-WAN, but I'm not entirely sure. We studied it in relation to Viptela.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Does it want me to do both steps or just one of the options? I'll double-check the instructions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
1 year ago
I know it's a tricky situation, but Lisa should definitely go with option B. She's not a magician, so she can't promise the full confidentiality the whistleblower wants. Honesty is the best policy, even if it's not the easiest path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
1 year ago
Whoa, option D is a big no-no! Promising confidentiality when you know you can't keep it is a serious breach of ethics. Lisa should never lie, even if it benefits her employer. That's a fast track to getting fired... or worse.
upvoted 0 times
Paulene
1 year ago
D) Honesty and integrity are key in maintaining trust with potential whistleblowers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
1 year ago
C) It's important for Lisa to follow ethical guidelines in handling sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
1 year ago
B) The whistleblower's trust is crucial for a successful investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
1 year ago
A) Lisa should explain that she will try her best to keep the whistleblower's identity confidential.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phyliss
1 year ago
Option C is the way to go. Lisa has to be honest and let the whistleblower know that their identity can't be kept confidential. No point in building false expectations, even if it's the 'nice' thing to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
1 year ago
Confidentiality is crucial for whistleblowers, so I'd go with option A. Lisa shouldn't sacrifice that just because the whistleblower isn't a formal suspect. Unless she's Sherlock Holmes, of course.
upvoted 0 times
Horace
1 year ago
B) Absolutely, it's important for Lisa to assure the whistleblower that their identity will be protected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
1 year ago
A) That's true, confidentiality is key for whistleblowers to come forward without fear of retaliation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
1 year ago
B) Lisa should explain that she will try her best to keep the whistleblower's identity confidential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
1 year ago
A) Lisa may offer the whistleblower full confidentiality because they are not a suspect
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky ethical situation. I think option B is the most accurate - Lisa should be upfront that she'll try her best to keep the whistleblower's identity confidential, but can't make any absolute guarantees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be unethical for Lisa to lie to the whistleblower?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel