New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 3 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 3
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Which of the following situations would MOST LIKELY require access to nonpublic records to develop evidence?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Yaeko at Jul 15, 2024, 06:44 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Investigation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Marsha
3 months ago
C is also a good choice, business filings can be tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
3 months ago
Totally agree with B, that one stands out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
4 months ago
Wait, can you really access someone's mobile records that easily?
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
4 months ago
I think D might need nonpublic records too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
4 months ago
Definitely B, personal mobile records are usually private.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
4 months ago
Option D seems like it could require nonpublic records too, especially if the ownership isn't easily accessible. I just can't recall if it's the most likely one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A, finding out where a person lives, but I wonder if that really needs nonpublic records or if there are other ways to find that out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we discussed business filings. I feel like option C could also involve nonpublic records, but it might depend on the context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
5 months ago
I think option B about reviewing personal mobile phone records might require nonpublic access, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the most likely scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
5 months ago
Reviewing someone's personal mobile records is definitely the most sensitive and private information here, so that's got to be the right answer. I feel good about selecting B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Finding someone's address is usually public information, so A is probably not the best answer. Obtaining business filings and real estate ownership info could also require accessing nonpublic records. I'm leaning towards B or D, but I'm a bit unsure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I think all of these situations could potentially involve accessing nonpublic records, depending on the specific circumstances. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward - reviewing personal mobile phone records would definitely require access to nonpublic records, so I'm pretty confident B is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking about evaluating the health of the appliance or preparing for the update? I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. Excluding workflow, automations, validations, and verifications could help simplify the first phase. I'll make sure to justify my choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
10 months ago
I'm going with Option A. Just a quick trip to the public records office, and I'll have that person's address in no time!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
10 months ago
Option B, of course! What better way to get the dirt on someone than by snooping through their private phone records?
upvoted 0 times
Eura
8 months ago
I think it ultimately depends on the specific situation and what kind of evidence is needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
9 months ago
True, but personal mobile phone records can reveal a lot of personal and potentially incriminating information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
9 months ago
But wouldn't accessing a company's business filings also provide valuable information for evidence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
9 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most intrusive but effective way to gather evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karma
10 months ago
I dunno, Option D seems like it could be tricky. Trying to dig up real estate ownership info might require some specialized knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Cordell
9 months ago
I think obtaining a company's business filings could also require access to nonpublic records for evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
9 months ago
Yeah, it might involve accessing nonpublic records to determine who owns a piece of real estate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
9 months ago
Option D does seem like it could be tricky. Real estate ownership info can be complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dion
11 months ago
Option C is the most straightforward - company filings are public information, right? This one seems like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
Alberto
9 months ago
C) Obtaining a company's business filings
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
9 months ago
B) Reviewing an individual's personal mobile phone records
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
10 months ago
A) Finding out where a person lives
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
10 months ago
I agree, accessing a company's business filings would most likely require access to nonpublic records to develop evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
10 months ago
Option C is the most straightforward - company filings are public information, right? This one seems like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlen
11 months ago
Hmm, accessing someone's personal phone records definitely raises some ethical concerns. I wonder if there are any legal limitations on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
11 months ago
But what about obtaining a company's business filings? That could also involve nonpublic records, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
11 months ago
I agree with Mary. Personal mobile phone records are private and would need special access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
11 months ago
Option B seems the most invasive of individual privacy. I'll have to think carefully about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
11 months ago
I think reviewing an individual's personal mobile phone records would require access to nonpublic records.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel