New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 3 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 3
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Which of the following statements concerning access to nonpublic records is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Tegan at Apr 04, 2025, 08:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Investigation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lucy
3 months ago
C sounds legit, audit clauses are standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
3 months ago
Totally agree, B seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
3 months ago
Not sure about B, that doesn't sound right at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
3 months ago
Wait, D? Can a private examiner really access those documents?
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
3 months ago
A is true, subpoenas are common in civil cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards D being the false statement, but I’m not completely confident. It’s tricky when it comes to access rights during investigations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
4 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question similar to this before, and I think A is true. Subpoenas are common in civil litigation for accessing records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
4 months ago
I’m not sure about B. It seems like a fraud examiner would need some legal basis to request bank records, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
4 months ago
I think option D sounds off. I remember something about how non-government examiners can't just access documents obtained by the government.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
5 months ago
This is a classic legal question that requires knowing the boundaries of what's allowed. I feel pretty confident in my understanding of these principles, so I should be able to identify the false statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is understanding the legal rights and limitations for accessing records in civil litigation, fraud investigations, and government investigations. I'll methodically go through each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the rules around accessing nonpublic records in different contexts. I'll have to weigh the details of each statement carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the nuances. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the legal principles involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
10 months ago
Haha, these fraud examiners must think they're private investigators or something. Option B is a big no-no!
upvoted 0 times
Marge
8 months ago
It's important to remember that fraud examiners not employed by the government do not have the right to access documents obtained during a criminal investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
8 months ago
Yeah, an audit clause can definitely allow access to a business partner's books, but not without proper authorization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
9 months ago
I think option A is more common, with parties obtaining subpoenas for bank records during civil litigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
9 months ago
I agree, fraud examiners should not have the authority to request bank records without legal obligation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nettie
10 months ago
Option B is totally false. Fraud examiners are not superheroes who can just swoop in and take whatever records they want!
upvoted 0 times
Vincenza
8 months ago
D) During the government's criminal investigation, a fraud examiner not employed by the government has a right to access relevant documents that the government has obtained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
8 months ago
C) An audit clause can be designed to allow a party to inspect the books of a business partner or vendor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
9 months ago
A) When civil litigation has commenced, a party often may obtain a subpoena or legal order for an individual's relevant bank records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nicolette
10 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. During a criminal investigation, the government can access relevant documents, but a private fraud examiner can't.
upvoted 0 times
Sommer
9 months ago
C) An audit clause can be designed to allow a party to inspect the books of a business partner or vendor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
9 months ago
C) An audit clause can be designed to allow a party to inspect the books of a business partner or vendor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
9 months ago
B) A fraud examiner can request a business's bank records even if the business is not legally obligated to comply.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
9 months ago
B) A fraud examiner can request a business's bank records even if the business is not legally obligated to comply.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
10 months ago
A) When civil litigation has commenced, a party often may obtain a subpoena or legal order for an individual's relevant bank records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
10 months ago
A) When civil litigation has commenced, a party often may obtain a subpoena or legal order for an individual's relevant bank records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawn
10 months ago
But doesn't the question ask for the FALSE statement? I think D is correct because a fraud examiner not employed by the government does not have the right to access government-obtained documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
11 months ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
11 months ago
Definitely B. Fraud examiners can't just demand a business's private records without a valid legal basis.
upvoted 0 times
Hannah
10 months ago
That's true, there needs to be a legal basis for accessing nonpublic records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
10 months ago
I agree, fraud examiners can't just request private records without a valid reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ty
11 months ago
Option B seems wrong. Businesses have no obligation to hand over their records just because a fraud examiner requests them.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel