Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Which of the following is TRUE of a well-written fraud examination report?
B) The report should discuss only the evidence that substantiates the fraud allegation
A) The details of witness interviews should be reported in a separate memorandum.
C) All information provided by witnesses, regardless of relevance, should be included in the report.
D) Technical terms should be included whenever possible to convey professionalism.

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 2
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Which of the following is TRUE of a well-written fraud examination report?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Therese at Aug 03, 2024, 12:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Investigation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Krystina
6 months ago
Really? I thought all witness info was important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
6 months ago
D is a no-go, clarity over jargon any day!
upvoted 0 times
...
King
7 months ago
Wait, C? Why would you include irrelevant info?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
7 months ago
Totally agree, B makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
7 months ago
A is correct, witness details go in a separate memo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
7 months ago
I remember we discussed how using technical terms can sometimes confuse the reader, so I’m not sure if that’s a good practice for reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
8 months ago
I feel like including all witness information could clutter the report, but I’m not confident about what’s considered relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
8 months ago
I think the report should focus on evidence that supports the fraud claim, but I can't recall if it should exclude other details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
8 months ago
I vaguely remember that witness interviews should be summarized, but I'm not sure if they go in a separate memo or the main report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to carefully consider each option and think about the best way to communicate the findings effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
8 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this. A well-written report should present the evidence objectively, without unnecessary fluff or technical jargon.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should the report include all witness information, or just the relevant details? I'll have to review my notes to make sure I understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
8 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. The key is to focus on what makes a report "well-written" - it should be clear, concise, and only include relevant details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the purpose of a fraud examination report and what information should be included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. I'll select the options that seem to be the least critical or most open to interpretation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
1 year ago
If I see the word 'synergistic' in a fraud report, I'm walking out of that exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
1 year ago
I bet the writer of Option D is the same person who thinks using big words makes them sound smarter. Just write clearly, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
1 year ago
Option C is just ridiculous. Including every single detail, relevant or not, would make the report unwieldy and difficult to read. A well-written report requires discernment and focus.
upvoted 0 times
Barrett
11 months ago
Including technical terms may be necessary for clarity, but they shouldn't be overused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
12 months ago
I believe the report should be concise and to the point, focusing on key evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
12 months ago
I think the report should only include information that is pertinent to the fraud investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
12 months ago
I agree, including irrelevant details would just clutter the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annelle
1 year ago
I'm torn between A and C. On one hand, witness interview details could be distracting in the main report. But on the other hand, excluding any information could be seen as selective reporting.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
11 months ago
I think it's important to include all information provided by witnesses to ensure transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
12 months ago
C) All information provided by witnesses, regardless of relevance, should be included in the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 year ago
A) The details of witness interviews should be reported in a separate memorandum.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lemuel
1 year ago
I disagree with Option D. Using technical terms just for the sake of sounding professional is not the goal of a well-written report. The focus should be on clear and concise communication.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
12 months ago
I believe the report should focus on the evidence that supports the fraud allegation, not just any technical terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 year ago
I think including all information from witnesses, even if not relevant, could make the report too cluttered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 year ago
I agree with you. The report should be easy to understand for everyone.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
1 year ago
Option B seems the most appropriate. The report should focus on the relevant evidence that supports the fraud allegation, not irrelevant details or witness interviews.
upvoted 0 times
Frank
12 months ago
Including irrelevant details can distract from the main fraud allegation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
12 months ago
It's important to keep the report concise and to the point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 year ago
Including only relevant evidence makes the report more focused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
I agree, option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odette
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel