Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Which of the following is TRUE of a well-written fraud examination report?
B) The report should discuss only the evidence that substantiates the fraud allegation
A) The details of witness interviews should be reported in a separate memorandum.
C) All information provided by witnesses, regardless of relevance, should be included in the report.
D) Technical terms should be included whenever possible to convey professionalism.

ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam - Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 2
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Which of the following is TRUE of a well-written fraud examination report?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Therese at Aug 03, 2024, 12:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Investigation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Krystina
9 months ago
Really? I thought all witness info was important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
9 months ago
D is a no-go, clarity over jargon any day!
upvoted 0 times
...
King
10 months ago
Wait, C? Why would you include irrelevant info?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
10 months ago
Totally agree, B makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
10 months ago
A is correct, witness details go in a separate memo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
10 months ago
I remember we discussed how using technical terms can sometimes confuse the reader, so I’m not sure if that’s a good practice for reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
I feel like including all witness information could clutter the report, but I’m not confident about what’s considered relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
11 months ago
I think the report should focus on evidence that supports the fraud claim, but I can't recall if it should exclude other details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
11 months ago
I vaguely remember that witness interviews should be summarized, but I'm not sure if they go in a separate memo or the main report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to carefully consider each option and think about the best way to communicate the findings effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this. A well-written report should present the evidence objectively, without unnecessary fluff or technical jargon.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should the report include all witness information, or just the relevant details? I'll have to review my notes to make sure I understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. The key is to focus on what makes a report "well-written" - it should be clear, concise, and only include relevant details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the purpose of a fraud examination report and what information should be included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. I'll select the options that seem to be the least critical or most open to interpretation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
1 year ago
If I see the word 'synergistic' in a fraud report, I'm walking out of that exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
1 year ago
I bet the writer of Option D is the same person who thinks using big words makes them sound smarter. Just write clearly, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
1 year ago
Option C is just ridiculous. Including every single detail, relevant or not, would make the report unwieldy and difficult to read. A well-written report requires discernment and focus.
upvoted 0 times
Barrett
1 year ago
Including technical terms may be necessary for clarity, but they shouldn't be overused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
1 year ago
I believe the report should be concise and to the point, focusing on key evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
1 year ago
I think the report should only include information that is pertinent to the fraud investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
1 year ago
I agree, including irrelevant details would just clutter the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annelle
1 year ago
I'm torn between A and C. On one hand, witness interview details could be distracting in the main report. But on the other hand, excluding any information could be seen as selective reporting.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
1 year ago
I think it's important to include all information provided by witnesses to ensure transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
1 year ago
C) All information provided by witnesses, regardless of relevance, should be included in the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 year ago
A) The details of witness interviews should be reported in a separate memorandum.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lemuel
1 year ago
I disagree with Option D. Using technical terms just for the sake of sounding professional is not the goal of a well-written report. The focus should be on clear and concise communication.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
1 year ago
I believe the report should focus on the evidence that supports the fraud allegation, not just any technical terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 year ago
I think including all information from witnesses, even if not relevant, could make the report too cluttered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 year ago
I agree with you. The report should be easy to understand for everyone.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
1 year ago
Option B seems the most appropriate. The report should focus on the relevant evidence that supports the fraud allegation, not irrelevant details or witness interviews.
upvoted 0 times
Frank
1 year ago
Including irrelevant details can distract from the main fraud allegation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
1 year ago
It's important to keep the report concise and to the point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 year ago
Including only relevant evidence makes the report more focused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
I agree, option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odette
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel