Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE Exam CFE-Investigation Topic 2 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 2
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Which of the following is TRUE of a well-written fraud examination report?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Therese at Aug 03, 2024, 12:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Investigation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Estrella
1 months ago
If I see the word 'synergistic' in a fraud report, I'm walking out of that exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
1 months ago
I bet the writer of Option D is the same person who thinks using big words makes them sound smarter. Just write clearly, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
1 months ago
Option C is just ridiculous. Including every single detail, relevant or not, would make the report unwieldy and difficult to read. A well-written report requires discernment and focus.
upvoted 0 times
Lea
4 days ago
I believe the report should be concise and to the point, focusing on key evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
8 days ago
I think the report should only include information that is pertinent to the fraud investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
14 days ago
I agree, including irrelevant details would just clutter the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annelle
1 months ago
I'm torn between A and C. On one hand, witness interview details could be distracting in the main report. But on the other hand, excluding any information could be seen as selective reporting.
upvoted 0 times
Marica
6 days ago
C) All information provided by witnesses, regardless of relevance, should be included in the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
22 days ago
A) The details of witness interviews should be reported in a separate memorandum.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lemuel
2 months ago
I disagree with Option D. Using technical terms just for the sake of sounding professional is not the goal of a well-written report. The focus should be on clear and concise communication.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
15 days ago
I believe the report should focus on the evidence that supports the fraud allegation, not just any technical terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
29 days ago
I think including all information from witnesses, even if not relevant, could make the report too cluttered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 months ago
I agree with you. The report should be easy to understand for everyone.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
2 months ago
Option B seems the most appropriate. The report should focus on the relevant evidence that supports the fraud allegation, not irrelevant details or witness interviews.
upvoted 0 times
Frank
3 days ago
Including irrelevant details can distract from the main fraud allegation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
7 days ago
It's important to keep the report concise and to the point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
18 days ago
Including only relevant evidence makes the report more focused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
20 days ago
I agree, option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odette
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel