I think we practiced a question similar to this, and it was about analyzing transaction amounts. So, vendor invoice amounts seem like a likely candidate.
I'm going to go with vendor invoice amounts. That financial data is more likely to follow Benford's Law compared to things like phone numbers or employee IDs.
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Benford's Law is used to detect anomalies, but I'm not sure which of these data sets would be the most applicable.
Vendor invoice amounts seem like the most obvious choice here. That's the kind of financial data that Benford's Law is often used to analyze for potential fraud.
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the principles of Benford's Law and which types of data are most likely to follow that distribution.
Vendor invoices, hands down. It's like a treasure trove of potential fraud just waiting to be uncovered. Plus, I heard the fraud examiner gets a bonus for every dodgy invoice they find.
Bank account numbers? Nah, that's too obvious. Gotta go with employee IDs - you never know what kind of sneaky stuff people might be up to with their own data.
Gayla
3 months agoEden
3 months agoMeaghan
3 months agoLera
3 months agoCarlota
3 months agoEdwin
4 months agoCammy
4 months agoBettina
4 months agoQuentin
4 months agoPete
5 months agoLauran
5 months agoAnnice
5 months agoDelpha
5 months agoJerilyn
8 months agoDierdre
6 months agoJolene
6 months agoTora
7 months agoShay
7 months agoSanjuana
8 months agoStephen
7 months agoLilli
7 months agoScarlet
8 months agoRebbecca
8 months agoOlga
8 months agoMelinda
7 months agoQuentin
7 months agoPhung
7 months agoCletus
8 months agoDorothy
7 months agoMitsue
7 months agoTheron
8 months agoMirta
9 months agoAaron
7 months agoJolanda
8 months agoHerschel
8 months agoLauran
8 months agoElbert
8 months agoKate
8 months agoMarci
9 months agoJunita
9 months ago