An investigator is preparing to administer what is likely to be an intense and extended interview with a fraud suspect. To organize their thoughts prior to the interview, the fraud examiner should:
I'm pretty confident that the right answer is to develop a list of questions ranked in order of importance. That way, I can guide the interview and make sure I get all the critical information I need.
Providing the suspect with a list of questions seems like a bad idea - that could give them too much control over the interview. I'm leaning towards making a list of key points to cover instead.
Hmm, I think the best approach here is to develop a list of questions ranked in order of importance. That way, I can focus on the most critical information first and still have a plan for the rest of the interview.
This seems like a tricky question. I'm not sure if I should provide the suspect with a list of questions or just make a list of key points to cover. I'll have to think this through carefully.
Kristeen
5 months agoTanesha
5 months agoLindsey
5 months agoMargart
5 months agoMarge
6 months agoNada
6 months agoBrunilda
6 months agoMinna
6 months agoMicaela
6 months agoCarissa
6 months agoLenora
6 months agoSolange
6 months agoBen
7 months agoLorrine
11 months agoVirgie
11 months agoLisha
10 months agoTarra
11 months agoJohnson
11 months agoErnest
11 months agoHermila
11 months agoKanisha
11 months agoGladys
12 months agoDottie
11 months agoNu
11 months agoJovita
11 months agoLuis
11 months agoEarleen
11 months agoLeonor
12 months agoGerman
12 months agoGail
1 year agoKatina
1 year agoDonte
11 months agoNakisha
12 months agoIvette
1 year agoJani
1 year agoAdolph
1 year ago