ACFE CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Exam - Topic 4 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence exam

Question #: 76
Topic #: 4

[All CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Questions]

Benjamin, a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). was contacted regarding an engagement to investigate a complex money laundering case spanning numerous international jurisdictions and involving multiple cutting-edge technologies. Benjamin had previously attended a seminar on investigating money laundering schemes, but he had no other training or experience in such cases. However, he accepted the engagement and chose to conduct the work himself. Benjamin's conduct would likely be a violation of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics.

ATrue

BFalse

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Rebecka at Jan 25, 2024, 03:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alline

6 months ago

I’m surprised he took it on without proper training!

upvoted 0 times

...

Roosevelt

6 months ago

This definitely violates the ACFE Code of Ethics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

7 months ago

Really? I thought attending a seminar was enough.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pansy

7 months ago

Totally agree, he should have declined the engagement!

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettina

7 months ago

Benjamin has no experience in money laundering cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earlean

7 months ago

I feel like there might be some gray area here. He did attend a seminar, but is that enough for such a complex investigation?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marquetta

8 months ago

This reminds me of a practice question we did about ethical responsibilities. I think accepting the case without proper expertise is definitely a breach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricarda

8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think the ACFE Code emphasizes competence. If he lacks experience, it could be problematic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

8 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of having adequate training for complex cases like money laundering. This seems like a clear violation of ethics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alisha

8 months ago

This is straightforward to me. By accepting an engagement that he was not qualified for, Benjamin clearly violated the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics. The fact that he had no other training or experience in such cases, beyond a single seminar, makes his decision to take on the work himself unethical. I'm confidently selecting True.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carla

8 months ago

I'm a bit confused here. On one hand, Benjamin did have some prior training on money laundering, but on the other hand, he didn't have direct experience with these types of complex cases. I'm not sure if that would be considered a violation or not. Hmm, I'll have to think it over.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnda

8 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the information provided, it seems clear that Benjamin's lack of training and experience in money laundering cases would be a violation of the ACFE's ethical standards. I'm going with True on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassie

8 months ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm not too familiar with the specifics of the ACFE Code, but it sounds like Benjamin may have taken on a case he wasn't fully qualified for. I'll have to think this through.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yan

8 months ago

This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully review the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics to determine if Benjamin's conduct would be a violation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glennis

8 months ago

I've got a good feeling about this one. The key is figuring out how to automatically add users to the local Administrators group on the VMs. I think I know the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clement

8 months ago

I remember studying that second-party audits are often linked to contractual obligations, so maybe it's related to the purchase contract?

upvoted 0 times

...

Salley

8 months ago

This is a good question to test our understanding of the data migration process. I'm leaning towards option B - Prepare, Plan, Validate, Execute, Text. Validating the data before and after the migration is important to ensure everything is transferred correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phil

1 year ago

Wow, Benjamin really jumped in over his head on this one. I hope he has a good lawyer on speed dial, because the ACFE is not going to be happy about this.

upvoted 0 times

Yen

12 months ago

It's important to always consider ethical guidelines and professional standards in these situations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

1 year ago

He should have consulted with more experienced colleagues or sought additional training.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincent

1 year ago

Benjamin should have considered his lack of experience before accepting the engagement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

1 year ago

Haha, Benjamin must have thought he could solve this case with his slick talking and a few Google searches. Bad move, my friend. The ACFE won't be amused.

upvoted 0 times

Dyan

1 year ago

He should have referred the case to someone with more experience in investigating money laundering schemes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denise

1 year ago

Benjamin should have known better than to take on a case he wasn't qualified for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Suzi

1 year ago

He should have referred the case to someone with more experience in investigating money laundering schemes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coleen

1 year ago

Benjamin should have known better than to take on a case he wasn't qualified for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawrence

1 year ago

I agree with Adelle, the answer is True. Benjamin should have considered his lack of experience and sought help to ensure a thorough investigation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nancey

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is False. Benjamin attended a seminar on investigating money laundering schemes, so he had some relevant training.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelle

1 year ago

I think the answer is True because Benjamin should have sought additional training or assistance for such a complex case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

1 year ago

I agree, Benjamin's lack of relevant experience and training in money laundering investigations is a huge red flag. He's setting himself up for failure and potential liability.

upvoted 0 times

Avery

1 year ago

Benjamin's decision to conduct the work himself without the necessary experience is definitely a violation of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawana

1 year ago

B) False

upvoted 0 times

...

Lewis

1 year ago

I agree, Benjamin should have sought out additional training or expertise before taking on such a complex case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Basilia

1 year ago

A) True

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincent

1 year ago

I think this is a clear-cut violation of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics. Benjamin should have declined the engagement or sought assistance from more experienced professionals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawana

1 year ago

True. Even though Benjamin attended a seminar, investigating such a complex case without proper experience could still be a violation of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennie

1 year ago

False. Benjamin attended a seminar on investigating money laundering schemes, so he had some relevant training.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacki

1 year ago

True. Benjamin should not have accepted the engagement without proper training or experience.

upvoted 0 times

...