Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Exam - Topic 4 Question 109 Discussion

[Ethical Responsibilities of the Fraud Examiner]Which of the following would MOST LIKELY be a violation of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics?
D) All of the above are violations
A) Green a CFE, uncovered several material internal control deficiencies unrelated to the financial statement fraud he was investigating. In his final report to management. Green included information about the deficiencies even though they were unrelated to the situation he was hired to investigate.
B) Stephanie, a CFE, accepted a fraud examination assignment and then instructed a lower-level employee to assess the company's cash records for signs of fraud. She took his word when he said there was no evidence of wrongdoing and ended up failing to uncover a very costly fraud scheme.
C) Susan, a CFE, was hired by a client to conduct a fraud examination but found nothing amiss A year later, she received a legal order from the local prosecutor's office to provide the client's file. Susan complied with the court order, even though she did not have the client's authorization to do so.

ACFE CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Exam - Topic 4 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 4
[All CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Questions]

[Ethical Responsibilities of the Fraud Examiner]

Which of the following would MOST LIKELY be a violation of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Stephanie at Jul 03, 2025, 12:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Skye
8 months ago
B seems like a big oversight, but not sure it's a violation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? She was just following a court order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
9 months ago
I agree, A is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
9 months ago
All of them seem sketchy, but D feels too broad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
9 months ago
A is definitely a violation, including unrelated info is unprofessional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
9 months ago
I wonder if D is the right answer since all of these scenarios seem to involve ethical lapses in some way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question about client confidentiality, and I feel like C might be a violation too since Susan disclosed information without authorization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think B could also be problematic since Stephanie didn't personally verify the findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
10 months ago
I remember discussing how including unrelated findings in a report could breach ethical guidelines, so I think A might be a violation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
10 months ago
I remember learning about situations like these in class. I'll need to think through how the ACFE Code would apply to each scenario to determine the most likely violation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
11 months ago
Ugh, ethics questions are the worst. I'm just going to guess and hope for the best. Ethical codes can be so ambiguous sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a good handle on the ACFE Code from my studies, so I think I can confidently identify the most likely violation here. I'll make sure to read the question and answer choices closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the specifics of the ACFE Code, so I'll need to think through each scenario carefully and try to apply the ethical principles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
11 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'll need to carefully review the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics to identify which of these scenarios would be the most likely violation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 year ago
I'm just imagining Rodrigo sitting there like, 'Oops, my bad. Didn't mean to expose those other issues.' Rookie move, man.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 year ago
Dude, these fraud examiners need to get their act together. All of these sound like major ethics breaches to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
1 year ago
I see your point, maybe D is the correct answer after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
1 year ago
Hah, Tom's just throwing his client under the bus. Disclosing information without authorization? Classic violation right there.
upvoted 0 times
Elinore
12 months ago
B) Vivian, a CFE, accepted an assignment to conduct a fraud examination within a manufacturing company. Because she was in a hurry to complete the investigation, she overlooked key items of evidence and ended up failing to uncover a major fraud scheme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
12 months ago
A) Rodrigo. a CFE. uncovered several material Internal control deficiencies unrelated to the Kickback scheme he was Investigating. In his final report to management. Rodrigo included information about the deficiencies even though they were unrelated to the situation he was hired to investigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reiko
1 year ago
I agree with Kami, it's important to stay focused on the task at hand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
1 year ago
But including unrelated deficiencies in the report seems like a violation of ethics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
1 year ago
Hmm, Vivian really dropped the ball there. Overlooking key evidence is a big no-no for a fraud examiner. That's gotta be a violation for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 year ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure Rodrigo should have included those unrelated control deficiencies in his report. Seems like a stretch to call that a violation.
upvoted 0 times
Lucille
1 year ago
It's all about maintaining integrity and being thorough in their investigations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
1 year ago
Yeah, I think they want to make sure fraud examiners stay focused on the task at hand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
1 year ago
I agree, it does seem like a tough call. But the Code of Professional Ethics is pretty strict.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel