Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Exam - Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Black a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE), was hired to conduct a fraud examination He did not find fraud, but in Black's opinion the controls he examined were deficient Under the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics Black is not permitted to express his opinion on the deficient controls.
B) False
A) True

ACFE CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Exam - Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 2
[All CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Questions]

Black a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE), was hired to conduct a fraud examination He did not find fraud, but in Black's opinion the controls he examined were deficient Under the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics Black is not permitted to express his opinion on the deficient controls.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Kristofer at Aug 22, 2022, 05:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nu
9 months ago
I thought he could at least suggest improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
9 months ago
False, he can still mention deficiencies without calling it fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
9 months ago
Wait, really? That seems a bit odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
9 months ago
Totally agree, that's how the ethics code works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
9 months ago
True, he can't express opinions on controls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
9 months ago
I believe it's false. The CFE can still highlight control deficiencies in a report, but maybe not in a way that implies fraud was present.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
9 months ago
I feel like this is a tricky one. If he didn't find fraud, does that mean he can't comment at all? I need to review the ethics section again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
9 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. I remember a practice question where the CFE could provide recommendations if they found deficiencies, even without fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
10 months ago
I think it's true that Black can't express his opinion on the controls since he didn't find fraud. It seems like a strict rule in the ethics code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
10 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the key is to focus on the requirements for corporate criminal liability. I'll review the options carefully and choose the one that best matches the typical criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
10 months ago
I'm a little confused - is the Backup and Restore tool also an option? I want to make sure I don't lose any important files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
10 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. I'll need to review my notes on information security policies and procedures to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options all seem plausible, but I'm not confident which one would be considered the "first filter." I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel