Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACDIS CCDS-O Exam - Topic 5 Question 5 Discussion

review]Clinic documentation states: ''Follow-up for post-induction chemotherapy for metastatic uterine cancer.'' To BEST identify the conditions being monitored and treated, a CDI specialist should
D) query for secondary sites.
A) clarify the morphology of the tumor.
B) evaluate diagnostic lab results.
C) review the record for MRI results.

ACDIS CCDS-O Exam - Topic 5 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACDIS's CCDS-O exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 5
[All CCDS-O Questions]

review]

Clinic documentation states: ''Follow-up for post-induction chemotherapy for metastatic uterine cancer.'' To BEST identify the conditions being monitored and treated, a CDI specialist should

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

When documentation states ''metastatic uterine cancer,'' the most important missing element for complete, accurate outpatient coding is where the cancer has metastasized (the secondary site[s]). In ambulatory CDI, identifying secondary sites best clarifies the full scope of disease being monitored and treated because metastatic disease coding relies on documenting both the primary malignancy and the specific metastatic location(s) (e.g., lung, liver, bone, peritoneum, lymph nodes). This supports correct severity representation, risk capture, treatment intent, and medical necessity for ongoing chemotherapy follow-up. While tumor morphology can be clinically relevant, it is usually established earlier in the diagnostic pathway and does not, by itself, define current metastatic burden. Likewise, reviewing labs or MRI results may provide supportive indicators, but they do not replace provider documentation of the confirmed metastatic sites being managed. A compliant query focused on secondary sites prompts the provider to document the current metastatic disease status (active, responding, progressing) and specific locations, which most directly identifies the conditions under treatment.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Novella
22 days ago
Clarifying tumor morphology could help too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
27 days ago
I think reviewing MRI results is more important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
1 month ago
Definitely need to query for secondary sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 month ago
Agree with the lab results, but all options have their merits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
1 month ago
Wait, are we sure MRI results are even relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
2 months ago
Isn't it more about the tumor morphology?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
2 months ago
I think querying for secondary sites is crucial too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
2 months ago
Definitely need to check the lab results first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
2 months ago
I lean towards querying for secondary sites since it directly relates to the metastatic nature of the cancer, but I wonder if lab results could provide more immediate insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
2 months ago
Clarifying the morphology could help, but I feel like it might not be the most immediate concern compared to other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
2 months ago
I remember practicing a question about evaluating lab results, and it seemed important for understanding the patient's current status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
3 months ago
I think we might need to focus on the secondary sites since it's metastatic cancer, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel