Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACDIS CCDS-O Exam - Topic 5 Question 5 Discussion

review]Clinic documentation states: ''Follow-up for post-induction chemotherapy for metastatic uterine cancer.'' To BEST identify the conditions being monitored and treated, a CDI specialist should
D) query for secondary sites.
A) clarify the morphology of the tumor.
B) evaluate diagnostic lab results.
C) review the record for MRI results.

ACDIS CCDS-O Exam - Topic 5 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACDIS's CCDS-O exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 5
[All CCDS-O Questions]

review]

Clinic documentation states: ''Follow-up for post-induction chemotherapy for metastatic uterine cancer.'' To BEST identify the conditions being monitored and treated, a CDI specialist should

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

When documentation states ''metastatic uterine cancer,'' the most important missing element for complete, accurate outpatient coding is where the cancer has metastasized (the secondary site[s]). In ambulatory CDI, identifying secondary sites best clarifies the full scope of disease being monitored and treated because metastatic disease coding relies on documenting both the primary malignancy and the specific metastatic location(s) (e.g., lung, liver, bone, peritoneum, lymph nodes). This supports correct severity representation, risk capture, treatment intent, and medical necessity for ongoing chemotherapy follow-up. While tumor morphology can be clinically relevant, it is usually established earlier in the diagnostic pathway and does not, by itself, define current metastatic burden. Likewise, reviewing labs or MRI results may provide supportive indicators, but they do not replace provider documentation of the confirmed metastatic sites being managed. A compliant query focused on secondary sites prompts the provider to document the current metastatic disease status (active, responding, progressing) and specific locations, which most directly identifies the conditions under treatment.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mertie
12 hours ago
I feel like option C is less relevant. MRI results are just one part of the picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
6 days ago
Option A could be important too. Knowing tumor morphology helps in treatment planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
11 days ago
I agree, but I lean towards option B. Lab results show treatment response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
16 days ago
I think option D is the best. Secondary sites are crucial to monitor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
21 days ago
C could help, but it’s not as direct as D for monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
26 days ago
A is important too, but I feel D covers more ground.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 month ago
I lean towards B. Lab results show treatment response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
1 month ago
I think D is the best choice. Secondary sites are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
1 month ago
C seems less relevant. MRI is just one part of the picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
2 months ago
A could be important too. Tumor morphology matters for treatment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards B. Lab results show treatment response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
2 months ago
I think D is the best choice. Secondary sites are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
Evaluating lab results is crucial for treatment decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the secondary sites? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
4 months ago
Clarifying tumor morphology could help too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
4 months ago
I think reviewing MRI results is more important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
4 months ago
Definitely need to query for secondary sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
4 months ago
Agree with the lab results, but all options have their merits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure MRI results are even relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
5 months ago
Isn't it more about the tumor morphology?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
5 months ago
I think querying for secondary sites is crucial too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
5 months ago
Definitely need to check the lab results first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
5 months ago
I lean towards querying for secondary sites since it directly relates to the metastatic nature of the cancer, but I wonder if lab results could provide more immediate insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
5 months ago
Clarifying the morphology could help, but I feel like it might not be the most immediate concern compared to other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about evaluating lab results, and it seemed important for understanding the patient's current status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
6 months ago
I think we might need to focus on the secondary sites since it's metastatic cancer, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best first step.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel