Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Acams CGSS Exam - Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CGSS exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 1
[All CGSS Questions]

In which situation should a financial institution sanctions team perform a historical review or lookback?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A historical review or lookback is warranted when previously unidentified data elements, missing reference data, or newly discovered customer attributes are detected that may have impacted earlier screening results. Sanctions and Compliance Domains explain that such scenarios indicate that past alerts may not have been correctly generated or evaluated, necessitating a retrospective review.

Routine list updates or daily refreshes do not automatically trigger lookbacks. New sanctions programs may require enhanced forward-looking monitoring, but only missing or newly uncovered data affecting past screening results justify a historical lookback.


Requirements for lookbacks when gaps in screening data are discovered.

Identification of previously missing identifiers as a trigger for retrospective review.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Skye
2 days ago
I think a lookback is necessary when new data points are detected, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only time.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel