Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 4 Question 78 Discussion

An offshore company is owned by four equal partners that reside in separate jurisdictions. One partner presents an authenticated power of attorney apparently executed by the remaining three partners in his favor and requests that a bank account be opened on behalf of all partners. He needs this done quickly because there is a large deposit pending. The account-opening officer contacts the bank's anti-money laundering officer for advice. Which of the following should the anti-money laundering officer advise as an initial step?
C) File a suspicious transaction report with the appropriate Financial Intelligence Unit.
A) Verify the identity of all the partners.
B) Verify the source of the deposit.
D) File a suspicious transaction report with the Egmont Group.

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 4 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 4
[All CAMS Questions]

An offshore company is owned by four equal partners that reside in separate jurisdictions. One partner presents an authenticated power of attorney apparently executed by the remaining three partners in his favor and requests that a bank account be opened on behalf of all partners. He needs this done quickly because there is a large deposit pending. The account-opening officer contacts the bank's anti-money laundering officer for advice. Which of the following should the anti-money laundering officer advise as an initial step?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, E

by Emerson at Jun 30, 2024, 02:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Francis
8 months ago
I’d lean towards C, better safe than sorry with suspicious transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
8 months ago
Totally agree with A, can't skip identity verification!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
8 months ago
Wait, how can one partner have power of attorney for the others? Sounds fishy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
9 months ago
I think B is more important, gotta check where that money's coming from.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
9 months ago
Definitely A, you need to know who you're dealing with!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
9 months ago
I vaguely recall that in cases like this, the source of the deposit is often prioritized to prevent money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
9 months ago
I feel like filing a suspicious transaction report might be too hasty at this stage. Shouldn't we confirm identities first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
10 months ago
I think we practiced a question where verifying the source of funds was crucial, especially with a large deposit involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
10 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of verifying identities in similar scenarios, but I'm not sure if that should be the first step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
10 months ago
Verifying the identities of the partners seems like the logical first move. I want to make sure everything checks out before proceeding with the account opening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
10 months ago
The key here is to act quickly but also thoroughly. I think verifying the identities of the partners is the best first step, as that will help determine if the power of attorney is valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. Should I also be looking into the source of the deposit, or is that not the initial step I should take?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
10 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I would focus on verifying the identity of all the partners to ensure the power of attorney is legitimate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards filing a suspicious transaction report with the appropriate Financial Intelligence Unit. With the large deposit and the power of attorney, there could be some shady activity going on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
10 months ago
I've got a good handle on the TOGAF ADM and the different version numbers. Based on my understanding, the version number that indicates a high-level outline of the architecture is in place is 0.5. I'm feeling pretty sure about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
10 months ago
The Veridata log file could be a good place to start, but I'm not sure if that's the best way to view the out-of-sync rows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the requirements and compare them to the JSON code segments to determine the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
10 months ago
I'm confident the answer is statistical multiplexing. The question specifically mentions dividing the channel into an arbitrary number of variable bit-rate streams, which is the defining characteristic of statistical multiplexing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
1 year ago
Hmm, a power of attorney and a large deposit? Sounds like someone's trying to pull a fast one. Step 1: Check the signatures, step 2: Call the Avengers.
upvoted 0 times
Gianna
1 year ago
C) File a suspicious transaction report with the appropriate Financial Intelligence Unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
1 year ago
B) Verify the source of the deposit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
1 year ago
A) Verify the identity of all the partners.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickie
1 year ago
The Egmont Group? Really? That's like calling the Ghostbusters for a leaky faucet. Stick to the local financial authorities, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
Amber
1 year ago
The Egmont Group? Really? That's like calling the Ghostbusters for a leaky faucet. Stick to the local financial authorities, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
C) File a suspicious transaction report with the appropriate Financial Intelligence Unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
1 year ago
B) Verify the source of the deposit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
1 year ago
A) Verify the identity of all the partners.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvie
1 year ago
Reporting a suspicious transaction to the Financial Intelligence Unit is the way to go. Better safe than sorry when it comes to potential money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
1 year ago
I think verifying the source of the deposit is also crucial to ensure the legitimacy of the funds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
1 year ago
Ah, the old 'large deposit pending' trick. The anti-money laundering officer should definitely look into the source of that deposit before anything else.
upvoted 0 times
Huey
1 year ago
Agreed, that should be the first step to take in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 year ago
Verify the source of the deposit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Penney
1 year ago
I agree with Howard. It's important to confirm the identities before proceeding with anything else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 year ago
Verifying the identities of all the partners is the logical first step. You can't just trust a power of attorney without confirming the signatories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
1 year ago
I think the anti-money laundering officer should verify the identity of all the partners first.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel