Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 4 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 4
[All CAMS Questions]

The compliance officer for a bank is reviewing on-boarding documents for a new business account for a

domestic corporation. The officer is unable to verify the identity of the beneficial owners of the company. Only

information on the nominee owners was provided, and none of the listed addresses are local. The purpose of

the business and future expected activity were disclosed to include cash letters, money orders and

international remittance transfers.

Which red flag identifies a heightened money laundering risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Catarina at Jan 06, 2023, 02:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Florinda
4 months ago
Not sure if cash letters and money orders are that risky, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
4 months ago
Agreed, nominee owners raise serious questions about transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
5 months ago
Wait, why are all the addresses outside the local area? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
5 months ago
I think the international remittance transfers are the biggest concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
5 months ago
Definitely a red flag with nominee owners involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where nominee ownership was a key factor, so I’m leaning towards that being a significant red flag here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
5 months ago
I feel like the addresses being outside the local area is definitely suspicious, especially for a new business account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
5 months ago
I think the international remittance transfers could indicate higher risk, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main concern here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how nominee owners can complicate identity verification, so that might be a red flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The leaf node is missing the EVPN NLRI configuration, so I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I know GDPR covers sensitive personal data like health, race, and political views, but I'm not 100% sure about financial information. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
6 months ago
I've got this! The question is asking what we customize to prepare for identifying duplicates. The answer has to be options A and B - defining recency/reliability and selecting comparison fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the question, I'm pretty sure the correct answer is option B, "dladm show-dev". That command should give me the information I need about the network devices installed on the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
10 months ago
Haha, this is like a 'spot the red flags' game. Nominee owners, international transfers, and no local addresses? Sounds like a money launderer's dream come true. I'd shut this down faster than you can say 'suspicious activity report'.
upvoted 0 times
Coleen
9 months ago
C) The names provided at account opening are identified as the corporation's representative nominees
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
9 months ago
B) The nature and purpose of the business include international remittance transfers
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
9 months ago
A) Expected activity was advised to include cash letter and money orders
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gussie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. The international remittance transfers could be legitimate business activities. But the lack of verification on the beneficial owners is concerning. I'd need more information to make a call on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Valda
9 months ago
C) The names provided at account opening are identified as the corporation's representative nominees
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
9 months ago
B) The nature and purpose of the business include international remittance transfers
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
9 months ago
A) Expected activity was advised to include cash letter and money orders
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aretha
11 months ago
Wow, this is a textbook case of potential money laundering activities. The nominee owners and the disclosed business activities are all huge red flags. I'd be very cautious about this account.
upvoted 0 times
Verona
9 months ago
We should definitely proceed with caution and conduct further investigation into this account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
9 months ago
The expected activity of cash letters and money orders is also concerning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
9 months ago
I think the fact that the account signer's ID lists addresses outside of where the account was opened is a major red flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
9 months ago
I agree, the combination of nominee owners and the disclosed business activities is definitely suspicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
10 months ago
D) Account signer's government issued identification lists addresses outside of where the branch account was opened
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
10 months ago
C) The names provided at account opening are identified as the corporation's representative nominees
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
10 months ago
B) The nature and purpose of the business include international remittance transfers
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
10 months ago
A) Expected activity was advised to include cash letter and money orders
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirk
11 months ago
The inability to verify the beneficial owners is a major red flag. Cash letters, money orders, and international remittance transfers are all common money laundering tactics. This is definitely a high-risk scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
11 months ago
I think option A is also a red flag, as cash letters and money orders can be used for money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
11 months ago
I agree with Mitsue, because the addresses listed should match where the account was opened.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
11 months ago
I think the red flag is option D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel