Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 3 Question 84 Discussion

Which unusual or suspicious activity by a financial institution's (FI's) employee requires additional investigation and scrutiny?
C) The employee lives a lavish lifestyle within their means.
A) The employee avoids taking periodic vacations despite having accrued vacation time.
B) The employee assists with transactions of a disclosed ultimate beneficiary.
D) The employee is involved in a minimal number of unresolved exceptions.

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 3 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 3
[All CAMS Questions]

Which unusual or suspicious activity by a financial institution's (FI's) employee requires additional investigation and scrutiny?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, E

by Cary at Sep 19, 2024, 02:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shawnna
10 months ago
B seems normal, why would that need scrutiny?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
10 months ago
A is a classic red flag, needs more digging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
10 months ago
Really? Living lavishly within means raises flags for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
10 months ago
I think C is fine as long as they can afford it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
11 months ago
A is definitely suspicious, who doesn't take vacation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the vacation avoidance is definitely the most concerning. It’s often linked to employees hiding something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
11 months ago
I feel like the question about unresolved exceptions is tricky. It might not be enough on its own to warrant investigation, but it could be a part of a larger pattern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the lavish lifestyle could indicate something suspicious, especially if their salary doesn't match it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
11 months ago
I remember discussing how employees who avoid taking vacations can be a red flag for potential misconduct. It seems like a good option to investigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure I fully understand the context or what specific types of suspicious activity they're looking for. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A. Avoiding taking vacation time is a well-known indicator of potential fraud or other misconduct. The other options don't seem as directly suspicious to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The key is identifying unusual or suspicious activity by the employee. A and B both seem like potential red flags, but I'm leaning towards A as the stronger answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I could see arguments for A or B being the correct answer. I'll need to think it through carefully before selecting an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the answer is A - the employee avoiding taking periodic vacations despite having accrued vacation time. That's a classic red flag for potential fraud or misconduct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
12 months ago
Hmm, let me think about this. I know there are different job evaluation methods, but I'm drawing a blank on the specific quantitative ones. I'll have to review my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
1 year ago
Hmm, let me think. If the employee is taking their work home and sleeping under their desk, that's gotta be a sign of something, right? Just sayin'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 year ago
D? Minimal exceptions? That's a good thing, isn't it? Sounds like this employee is doing their job well. What's the issue here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
C? Really? Living large on their paycheck? That's just good financial planning, not a problem at all. Lighten up, people!
upvoted 0 times
Whitney
1 year ago
That's a valid point, but it's still worth looking into to ensure everything is above board.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
1 year ago
But what if they just have a side hustle or investments that are paying off?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
1 year ago
I agree, it could be a sign of potential financial misconduct or fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
1 year ago
I think it's important to investigate any employee who is living beyond their means.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felton
1 year ago
I'd go with B. Helping the beneficiary is a bit of a red flag, you know? Doesn't hurt to dig a little deeper there.
upvoted 0 times
Cristen
1 year ago
D) The employee is involved in a minimal number of unresolved exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
1 year ago
I agree, B does seem suspicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
1 year ago
B) The employee assists with transactions of a disclosed ultimate beneficiary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
1 year ago
A) The employee avoids taking periodic vacations despite having accrued vacation time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raylene
1 year ago
I believe option A is also concerning. Avoiding taking vacations could be a sign that the employee is trying to hide something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
1 year ago
Definitely option A. That employee is clearly trying to hide something by avoiding vacations. You gotta keep an eye on those suspicious types!
upvoted 0 times
Donte
1 year ago
Yeah, it's a red flag for sure. We should investigate further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
1 year ago
I agree, avoiding vacations is definitely suspicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lisandra
1 year ago
I agree with Willis. Assisting with transactions of a disclosed ultimate beneficiary could be a red flag for illegal activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
1 year ago
I think option B is suspicious because it could indicate potential money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel