Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 3 Question 114 Discussion

Posted by Paris on May 28, 2026 at 07:30 AM

A compliance officer at a U.S. financial institution receives a grand jury subpoena requesting customer records related to an ongoing money laundering investigation involving a politically exposed person (PEP).

What should the compliance officer do first?

Suggested Answer: B

When a financial institution receives a grand jury subpoena, it is legally compelled to respond, but must do so in a controlled, lawful, and coordinated manner.

The first step is to consult with legal counsel to verify the subpoena's validity, scope, deadlines, and confidentiality requirements. Legal counsel ensures the institution responds accurately, protects privileged information, and complies with applicable laws.

Notifying the customer would constitute tipping off, which is prohibited. Immediate disclosure without legal review may result in over-disclosure or violation of customer privacy laws. Filing a SAR may be appropriate depending on the facts, but it is not the first step and must not reference the subpoena.

This approach aligns with U.S. AML, BSA, and law enforcement cooperation requirements.


Get Premium CAMS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
17 comments · newest first
EL
Elli 1 month ago
I feel like option B is the safest route.
CA
Carman 2 months ago
Filing a SAR is important, but not the first step here.
SH
Shad 2 months ago
Immediate action is risky; option C is not wise.
JO
Jody 2 months ago
Option A could lead to issues, better to get legal advice first.
CA
Carolynn 2 months ago
Notifying the customer could complicate things.
SO
Sophia 2 months ago
Definitely, they need to assess the validity of the subpoena.
CH
Chauncey 2 months ago
Agreed, option B makes the most sense.
SU
Suzi 3 months ago
I think the compliance officer should consult legal counsel first.
CA
Carin 3 months ago
B is the safest route, but what if the PEP is a big client?
VA
Valentine 3 months ago
I think D might be necessary too, right?
ST
Stephen 3 months ago
Surprised this is even a question, isn't it obvious?
CA
Cathrine 3 months ago
A is a bad idea, you can't just notify the customer.
MA
Malcom 4 months ago
Definitely B, always consult legal first!
SH
Sharan 4 months ago
I feel like immediately providing records could lead to serious issues, especially with a PEP involved. Consulting legal seems like the right move to start with.
GA
Galen 4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I believe that filing a SAR might be necessary, but it feels like it should come after consulting legal first.
CH
Cherelle 4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about not notifying the customer in these cases. Maybe that's why option A isn't the best choice?
DA
Daryl 4 months ago
I think the first step should be to consult with legal counsel. It seems like the safest option to assess the situation properly.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel