Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 2 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 2
[All CAMS Questions]

According to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). potential risk indicators related to money laundering proceeds from environmental crimes include. (Select Two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Maddie
2 days ago
B is a classic sign of suspicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
21 days ago
Totally agree, especially with C!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
26 days ago
A and C are definitely key indicators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
1 month ago
Haha, I bet the answer involves some kind of "waste" - either literal or figurative!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 month ago
C and D are the clear winners. Can't trust those politically exposed persons!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
1 month ago
B and C seem like the most relevant options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify risk indicators, and I think option B might be a good pick, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
2 months ago
I feel like option D could be relevant too, especially with cash-intensive businesses being a common red flag in money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 months ago
I think option C makes sense because unexplained wealth often ties back to corruption in resource management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
2 months ago
I remember studying about high-risk jurisdictions, but I'm not sure if option A is the best choice. It seems a bit too specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
2 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about FATF risk indicators, so I need to make sure I select the options that match their guidance. I'm leaning towards B and C, but I'll double-check the wording to be certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
2 months ago
Easy peasy! Options B and C are the clear winners here. The first one talks about suspicious payments from logging/waste companies, and the second one is all about unexplained wealth and transfers linked to politically exposed persons. I'm confident those are the two best answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm a bit unsure about some of the details in the options. I'll need to re-read them closely and make sure I'm picking the two that truly align with the FATF guidance on environmental crime-related money laundering risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
3 months ago
I lean towards B and D. They seem more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
3 months ago
I think A and C are the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
3 months ago
I'd go with B and D. Gotta watch out for those shady waste management companies!
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
4 months ago
Wait, are we really saying waste management is a red flag?
upvoted 0 times
...
An
4 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about potential risk indicators for money laundering from environmental crimes. I think options B and C sound like the most relevant ones, with the references to payments/transfers from suspicious sources and connections to politically exposed persons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
4 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key risk indicators related to environmental crimes and money laundering. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through which two best fit the criteria.
upvoted 0 times
Melinda
3 months ago
I think A and C are the most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel