Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

A financial institution opens a mortgage loan for a customer. During a subsequent internal review of the loan, it was noted that the appraisal used to support the loan was performed by an appraiser who was not on the institution's approved appraiser list. This exception was approved by the senior loan underwriter. The reviewer, who had examined other loans from the same general area, noted that the value on the loan appeared significantly higher than on other comparable properties. Which of the following should the anti-money laundering specialist recommend next?
C) Document the underwriter's actions prior to filing a suspicious transaction report.
A) Determine whether the loan underwriter reviewed the appraiser's license for validity.
B) Alert local law enforcement regarding a potential collusive relationship between the un-derwriter and appraiser.
D) Train the appraiser on anti-money laundering compliance for high-end real estate loans.

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 1
[All CAMS Questions]

A financial institution opens a mortgage loan for a customer. During a subsequent internal review of the loan, it was noted that the appraisal used to support the loan was performed by an appraiser who was not on the institution's approved appraiser list. This exception was approved by the senior loan underwriter. The reviewer, who had examined other loans from the same general area, noted that the value on the loan appeared significantly higher than on other comparable properties. Which of the following should the anti-money laundering specialist recommend next?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Dorothy at Apr 25, 2024, 09:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Laurena
10 months ago
Training the appraiser? Really? That feels like a band-aid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
10 months ago
Documenting the actions seems like the safest bet here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
10 months ago
Wait, how did the appraiser get approved if they weren't on the list?
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
10 months ago
Definitely should alert law enforcement. Too many red flags!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
11 months ago
Sounds like a major oversight on the underwriter's part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
11 months ago
Training the appraiser seems like a good idea, but I wonder if it addresses the immediate concerns about the appraisal's validity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
11 months ago
I think documenting the underwriter's actions is crucial before filing a suspicious transaction report, but I can't recall if that's the only thing we should do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
11 months ago
This situation feels similar to a practice question we did on loan reviews; I think alerting law enforcement might be too drastic without more evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of verifying appraiser credentials, but I'm not sure if that's the best next step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on whether we should alert law enforcement right away or try to gather more information first. The question doesn't provide a lot of context, so I'm not sure which option would be the best initial recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
11 months ago
Hmm, the fact that the appraiser wasn't on the approved list and the value was significantly higher than other comparable properties is definitely concerning. I'd want to dig deeper into the underwriter's actions and decision-making process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'd want to carefully review the details and consider the potential red flags before deciding on the best next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
11 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is to document the underwriter's actions and then file a suspicious transaction report. That seems like the most prudent approach to address any potential money laundering concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
12 months ago
Context Rules should run first, since they're more basic and fundamental to the product's behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
12 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Do I need to import the entire module or just the specific function? I'll have to think this through step-by-step to make sure I get the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
1 year ago
Hold on, are we sure the underwriter wasn't just trying to get their hands on some free real estate? Option C seems like the safest bet to investigate further without jumping to conclusions.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
1 year ago
D: Training the appraiser on anti-money laundering could also help prevent similar issues in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
1 year ago
C: I think we should also determine whether the appraiser's license is valid to ensure compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
1 year ago
C: Once we have all the documentation, we can decide on the best course of action to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 year ago
B: Yeah, it's important to have all the facts before making any accusations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
1 year ago
B: I agree, we need to gather all the necessary information before making any accusations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
1 year ago
A: Let's document the underwriter's actions first before taking any further steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
1 year ago
A: I agree, documenting the underwriter's actions first is a good idea before taking further steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julianna
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old conundrum of the underwriter and the appraiser. I think option D is a bit like trying to teach a cat to bark - the appraiser's probably not the root of the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
1 year ago
Ooh, the plot thickens! I'd be a bit skeptical of option B - alerting the local law enforcement seems a bit extreme without more concrete evidence. Let's keep our cool and follow the proper procedures.
upvoted 0 times
Mose
1 year ago
C) Document the underwriter's actions prior to filing a suspicious transaction report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
1 year ago
A) Determine whether the loan underwriter reviewed the appraiser's license for validity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daisy
1 year ago
I think documenting the underwriter's actions is also necessary before filing a report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky situation. I'd recommend going with option C - document the underwriter's actions before filing a suspicious transaction report. That way, we have a paper trail to support any potential follow-up actions.
upvoted 0 times
Sherita
1 year ago
Yes, it's always best to have all the necessary documentation in place before proceeding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 year ago
I think that would provide a solid foundation for any potential investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
1 year ago
It's important to have a clear record of what happened before taking further steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
1 year ago
I agree, documenting the underwriter's actions is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marta
1 year ago
I agree with Leila, checking the appraiser's license is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
1 year ago
I think we should determine if the appraiser's license is valid.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel