Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 1 Question 70 Discussion

A high-volume dealer of precious metals and stones in a high-risk jurisdiction is approached by a new customer interested in selling gold worth $200,000. The customer was referred by a longtime family friend of the dealer and provides no indication of background or business purpose for the sale. The dealer agrees to make the purchase based solely on the reference.What is the money laundering red flag?
C) A new customer is selling gold worth $200,000 to a high volume dealer
A) The customer was referred by a longtime friend of the dealer
B) The precious metals dealer is operating in a high-risk jurisdiction
D) The customer provides no background information or business purpose for the transaction

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 1 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 1
[All CAMS Questions]

A high-volume dealer of precious metals and stones in a high-risk jurisdiction is approached by a new customer interested in selling gold worth $200,000. The customer was referred by a longtime family friend of the dealer and provides no indication of background or business purpose for the sale. The dealer agrees to make the purchase based solely on the reference.

What is the money laundering red flag?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Markus at Mar 18, 2024, 09:20 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jerry
8 months ago
Selling $200k worth of gold without context? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
8 months ago
High-risk jurisdiction makes it even riskier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
8 months ago
Wait, no business purpose? That sounds sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
9 months ago
I disagree, referrals can be trustworthy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
9 months ago
The customer provides no background info, that's a huge red flag!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
9 months ago
I'm not sure, but I feel like the referral from a friend might not be enough to justify the purchase without more details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on new customers and large transactions. I think that might apply here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
10 months ago
I think the high-risk jurisdiction is definitely a concern, but I feel like the missing business purpose is more critical here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
10 months ago
I remember discussing how a lack of background information can be a major red flag in transactions like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
10 months ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one. There are a few different factors at play - the high-risk location, the large cash sale, and the lack of customer info. I'll have to weigh them all to decide the most significant red flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. The customer referral from a family friend could be a way to add legitimacy, but the lack of any stated business purpose is really suspicious. I think I'll go with option D on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. The high-risk jurisdiction and large cash transaction are also potential red flags, right? I'll need to think through all the details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward money laundering red flag to me. The lack of background information from the customer is the key issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Technology can be used in both efficient and inefficient ways.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
10 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward PIM protocol question. I'll start by thinking about the key characteristics of each packet type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
10 months ago
I just want to double-check—are we using the total gross hospital bed days directly in the formula? That part is clear, but I'm hesitant about the rounding rule again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
10 months ago
I think the IPA model does capitate practitioners, but I might be mixing it up with other managed care models from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
10 months ago
Wait, is the recording of problems also mandatory? I'm not 100% sure about that one. I better double-check my notes to make sure I don't miss anything important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
Wait, did you say 'high-volume dealer of precious metals'? I bet this guy's got a bad case of 'bling fever' and just can't stop buying shiny things. That's the real red flag here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 year ago
I don't know, maybe the friend referral is a good thing? It could just be an honest transaction. Although, the lack of business purpose is a bit suspicious. Hmm, tough call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
1 year ago
Come on, a new customer selling $200,000 worth of gold? That's like a giant neon sign saying 'I'm trying to launder money!'
upvoted 0 times
Cortney
1 year ago
The dealer should definitely proceed with caution in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
1 year ago
Definitely a red flag for potential money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
1 year ago
Agreed, especially with such a large amount of gold.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 year ago
Seems fishy, no background or business purpose given.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorenza
1 year ago
Yikes, high-risk jurisdiction and a high-volume dealer? That's a recipe for trouble. I bet this is a money laundering scheme if I ever saw one.
upvoted 0 times
Benton
1 year ago
B) The precious metals dealer is operating in a high-risk jurisdiction
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
1 year ago
D) The customer provides no background information or business purpose for the transaction
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
1 year ago
A) The customer was referred by a longtime friend of the dealer
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julie
1 year ago
Well, the obvious red flag here is the lack of background information from the customer. A big purchase with no explanation? Smells fishy to me.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
1 year ago
C: The dealer should definitely be more cautious in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
1 year ago
B: Yeah, that's a major red flag for money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
1 year ago
A: The customer provides no background information or business purpose for the transaction
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenna
1 year ago
But isn't it also concerning that the dealer is in a high-risk jurisdiction?
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
1 year ago
I agree with Hannah, not knowing the customer's background is risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
1 year ago
I think the red flag is option D, lack of background information.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel