Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 1 Question 109 Discussion

Which suspicious activity may be the strongest indicator of money laundering through a casino?
A) A privately held company originates funds transfers through the casino into the betting accounts of multiple patrons
B) A patron requests the casino to transfer their winnings to another gambling operator
C) A patron purchases a large amount of chips at a blackjack table using cash
D) A patron routinely places multiple bets on the same sporting events

Acams CAMS Exam - Topic 1 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 1
[All CAMS Questions]

Which suspicious activity may be the strongest indicator of money laundering through a casino?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Dorinda at Mar 04, 2026, 09:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Valentin
14 days ago
B could be a sign too. Transferring winnings? Why not just cash out?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
19 days ago
D seems odd too. Why bet the same events repeatedly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
24 days ago
I lean towards C. Large cash purchases scream money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
29 days ago
I think option A is really suspicious. Multiple patrons? Red flag!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
1 month ago
D seems odd as well. Why bet on the same events repeatedly? Sounds fishy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
1 month ago
C stands out for me. Large cash purchases at tables? Definitely raises eyebrows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 month ago
I feel like B is a big indicator too. Transferring winnings? Why not cash out?
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 months ago
I think option A is really suspicious. Multiple transfers? Red flag!
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
2 months ago
B is tricky. Transferring winnings could be normal, but still raises questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
2 months ago
D seems odd too. Why bet the same events repeatedly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
2 months ago
I lean towards C. Large cash purchases at blackjack? Definitely a sign.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
2 months ago
I think option A is really suspicious. Multiple patrons? Red flag!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
3 months ago
I doubt C is the strongest indicator, could just be a high roller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
3 months ago
Wait, can you really transfer winnings to another operator?
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
4 months ago
D is pretty common, not sure it's suspicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
4 months ago
Totally agree, A is a red flag too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
5 months ago
C seems sketchy, cash chips at blackjack?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
5 months ago
Really? I doubt C is that big of a deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
5 months ago
Wow, I never thought about A like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
5 months ago
D is just normal betting behavior, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
5 months ago
I think A is more suspicious, honestly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
5 months ago
C seems like a red flag for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
6 months ago
I’m not confident, but option D seems less likely to indicate money laundering compared to the others. It’s common for people to bet on the same events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because multiple patrons getting funds from a single company sounds really sketchy, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
6 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned something about transferring winnings, so option B could also be a red flag, but I feel like it depends on the context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
6 months ago
I think option C might be the strongest indicator since buying a large amount of chips with cash seems suspicious, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel