Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams CAMS-FCI Exam - Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

A client that runs a non-profit organization that aids refugees in leaving their home countries received a remittance from a money services business that was ten times the average. The client was recently detained for providing falsified passports to illegal immigrants. Which predicate offenses could be considered in the SAR/STR? (Select Two.)
A) Human smuggling/trafficking and B) Terrorist financing
C) Narcotics trafficking
D) Antiques smuggling
E) Tax evasion

Acams CAMS-FCI Exam - Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS-FCI exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 4
[All CAMS-FCI Questions]

A client that runs a non-profit organization that aids refugees in leaving their home countries received a remittance from a money services business that was ten times the average. The client was recently detained for providing falsified passports to illegal immigrants. Which predicate offenses could be considered in the SAR/STR? (Select Two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

The correct answer is A and B because human smuggling/trafficking and terrorist financing are both predicate offenses for money laundering that could be related to the client's activities. Option C is incorrect because there is no indication of narcotics trafficking in the scenario. Option D is incorrect because there is no indication of antiques smuggling in the scenario. Option E is incorrect because there is no indication of tax evasion in the scenario.


by Lore at Jun 19, 2026, 12:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS-FCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Renay
8 days ago
Agreed, A is the main concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
14 days ago
Right, but the focus is on smuggling. A is stronger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
19 days ago
True, A is the clear choice. But we should consider the implications of B too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
24 days ago
B seems less likely. A is more relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
29 days ago
Yeah, A makes sense. But what about B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
1 month ago
This is tricky. I think A is definitely one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 month ago
A and C could both apply, given the context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
1 month ago
Not sure about A, could be other reasons for that remittance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
Wow, ten times the average? That's suspicious!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
2 months ago
B) Terrorist financing seems a stretch here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
2 months ago
Definitely A) Human smuggling/trafficking. Makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 months ago
I thought narcotics trafficking was more about drugs, so I’m hesitant to pick that. Human smuggling feels like the clear choice, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
2 months ago
I feel like this question is similar to one we practiced about money laundering in non-profits. Human trafficking definitely fits, but I’m unsure about the second option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
3 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think terrorist financing could be relevant too, especially with the large remittance involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
3 months ago
I remember studying about human smuggling and trafficking in relation to non-profits. That seems like a strong possibility here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel