Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Acams CAMS-FCI Exam - Topic 4 Question 29 Discussion

The investigative department of a financial institution (Fl) receives an internal escalation notice from the remittance department for a SWIFT message requesting a refund due to potential fraud. The notice indicates that a total of three international incoming remittances were transferred to a corporate customer from Country A, in the amount of approximately 5 million EUR for each. The first two incoming remittances had been exchanged into currency B and transferred out to Country B a few days ago. The third incoming remittance has been held by the remittance department.As noted from the KYC profile, the corporate customer is working in the wood industry. with the last account review completed 3 months ago. Since the account's opening. there has been no history of a large amount of funds flowing through the account. The investigator conducts an Internet search and finds that the remitter is a food beverage company.The same morning, the investigator receives a call from a financial intelligence unit (FIU) inquiring about the same incident. The FIU states that it will issue a warrant to freeze the account on the same day.After further review, the decision is made that transactions appear suspicious. Which are the next steps the investigator should take? (Select Two.)
C) Provide additional information to the LE upon receiving a formal request. and E) Gather all the information that would be useful for law enforcement (LE) and recommend filing a SAR/STR
A) Close the customer's accounts since the FIU is issuing a warrant to freeze the funds.
B) Contact local LE and advise them of the investigation details to help speed up the investigation and prosecution.
D) Close the investigation as the FIU is already on this matter, and they will inform LE if needed.

Acams CAMS-FCI Exam - Topic 4 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS-FCI exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 4
[All CAMS-FCI Questions]

The investigative department of a financial institution (Fl) receives an internal escalation notice from the remittance department for a SWIFT message requesting a refund due to potential fraud. The notice indicates that a total of three international incoming remittances were transferred to a corporate customer from Country A, in the amount of approximately 5 million EUR for each. The first two incoming remittances had been exchanged into currency B and transferred out to Country B a few days ago. The third incoming remittance has been held by the remittance department.

As noted from the KYC profile, the corporate customer is working in the wood industry. with the last account review completed 3 months ago. Since the account's opening. there has been no history of a large amount of funds flowing through the account. The investigator conducts an Internet search and finds that the remitter is a food beverage company.

The same morning, the investigator receives a call from a financial intelligence unit (FIU) inquiring about the same incident. The FIU states that it will issue a warrant to freeze the account on the same day.

After further review, the decision is made that transactions appear suspicious. Which are the next steps the investigator should take? (Select Two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, E

The correct answer is C and E. The investigator should provide additional information to the LE upon receiving a formal request, and gather all the information that would be useful for LE and recommend filing a SAR/STR. These steps are consistent with the best practices of conducting financial crime investigations and reporting suspicious activity. The investigator should not close the customer's accounts or the investigation, as this may interfere with the ongoing LE inquiry and violate the FI's policies and procedures. The investigator should also not contact local LE directly, as this may compromise the confidentiality of the investigation and the FIU's authority. Reference:

Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, Chapter 4: Reporting Suspicious Activity, pages 40-411

Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, Chapter 5: Governance of an AFC Investigations Unit, pages 48-491

Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification | ACAMS


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Louvenia
3 days ago
Definitely, option B seems crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
8 days ago
I feel like we need to act fast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
14 days ago
This scenario is intense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
19 days ago
I’m not so sure about filing a SAR yet, need more evidence first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
24 days ago
Closing the accounts seems like the right move here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
29 days ago
Wait, why would a food company send money to a wood industry?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
1 month ago
Definitely agree, those remittances are suspicious!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
1 month ago
Sounds like a classic case of money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 month ago
Closing the accounts seems too hasty, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 months ago
Totally agree, contacting LE is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
2 months ago
Wait, why is a food company sending money to a wood industry?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
2 months ago
Definitely should file a SAR/STR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
2 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of money laundering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
2 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should close the accounts immediately or wait for the FIU's actions. I guess it depends on the urgency of the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
3 months ago
This situation seems similar to a practice case we went over. I think we decided that filing a SAR was always a good step, so E might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like contacting local law enforcement could be crucial. Maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
4 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of gathering all relevant information before taking action. I think option E makes sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel