Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Acams CAMS-FCI Exam - Topic 3 Question 32 Discussion

Posted by Nelida on Jun 27, 2026 at 11:54 AM

SAR/STR NARRATIVE

A SAR/STR has been submitted on five transactions conducted on the correspondent banking relationship with ABC Bank.

Client Information:

Remitter information: DEF Oil Resource Ltd. is the oldest member of the DEF Group. It was founded in 1977 as a general trading business with a primary focus on exports from Africa and North Americ

a. The group has business activities that span the entire energy value chain. Their core field of endeavor is centered within the oil and gas industry and its associated sub-sectors.

Beneficiary Information:

As per the response received from ABC Bank, it was determined that the beneficiaries are related to DEF Oil Resource Ltd. These were created by DEF Oil Resource Ltd. to purchase property in a foreign country on behalf of their senior management as part of a bonus scheme. The purpose behind this payment was for the purchase of property in another country.

Payment Reference:

ABCXXXXX31PZFG2H

ABCXXXXXX51PQGEH

ABCXXXXXX214QWVG

ABCXXXXXX41PSXA2

ABCXXXXXX815QWS3

Concerns:

* We are unsure about the country of incorporation of the beneficiaries.

* We are concerned about the transactional activity since the payment made towards entities (conducted on behalf of individuals) appears to be possible tax evasion.

* There appears to be an attempt to conceal the identity of individuals (senior management), which again raises concerns about the source of funds.

* Referring to the response received from ABC Bank, we are unclear about the ultimate beneficiary of funds.

* The remitter is involved in a high-risk business, (i.e., oil and crude products trading), and the beneficiary is involved in real estate business which again poses a higher risk.

While reviewing the account activity, it is noted that several transfers are sent to a company located in an offshore jurisdiction. Which step should the investigator take next?

Suggested Answer: C

The best step for the investigator to take next is to request information about the beneficiaries related to the company. This will help to identify the ultimate beneficial owners of the funds and the purpose of the transactions. Requesting information from the company or filing a SAR/STR to the FIU where the company is located may not be feasible or effective, as the company may not cooperate or the FIU may not have jurisdiction over the offshore entity. Conducting an open-source search may provide some information about the ownership and registration of the company, but it may not be sufficient or reliable to determine the nature and legitimacy of the transactions.


SAR Narrative Guidance Package

Best Practices for Drafting an STR or SAR

Get Premium CAMS-FCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
25 comments · newest first
CL
Clement 2 days ago
Practice makes perfect!
HO
Howard 7 days ago
I hope I can remember these points.
PA
Pamela 12 days ago
This scenario feels complex.
JU
Jules 17 days ago
I agree, transparency is key.
AN
Anthony 23 days ago
D gives us a clearer picture.
HE
Hermila 28 days ago
Filing a SAR could escalate things.
CL
Clement 1 month ago
A request might take too long.
PA
Pamela 1 month ago
True, that’s a concern.
HO
Howard 1 month ago
But what if they hide their identity?
JU
Jules 2 months ago
C could clarify beneficiary info.
HE
Hermila 2 months ago
I prefer option C.
AN
Anthony 2 months ago
Need to know who owns the company first.
CL
Clement 2 months ago
Why D?
AN
Anthony 2 months ago
I think option D is best.
HO
Howard 2 months ago
I feel overwhelmed by the details.
PA
Pamela 3 months ago
This question is tricky.
KA
Kaitlyn 3 months ago
Not sure if we can trust ABC Bank's info on the beneficiaries.
RE
Reita 3 months ago
High-risk industry + offshore transfers = major red flags.
LA
Lakeesha 3 months ago
Wait, they’re buying property for senior management? That’s odd.
CA
Camellia 3 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of potential tax evasion.
DA
Daisy 4 months ago
DEF Oil Resource Ltd. has been around since 1977.
BA
Barrett 4 months ago
I feel like we should definitely request information from the company, but I'm also worried about the implications of that. What if they don't respond?
TI
Timmy 4 months ago
This situation feels similar to a practice question we had about offshore transactions. I think filing a SAR/STR could be a valid option, but we should gather more info first.
AN
An 4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think we might need to request information about the beneficiaries related to the company. That could clarify some of our concerns.
NY
Nydia 4 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of understanding the ownership structure of companies in similar cases. It might be wise to conduct an open-source search first.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel