U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams CAMS-FCI Exam - Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion

An unusual spike in activity has occurred for a customer who is a supplier of aviation parts to a military force. The customer's current line of business is consistent with the banks records, and no adverse media hits have occurred. Which is the best reason for an investigator to continue an investigation?
A) The end-user is a military force.
B) There are no adverse media hits.
C) The customer is a supplier of aviation parts.
D) The current line of business is consistent with the bank's records.

Acams CAMS-FCI Exam - Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS-FCI exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 3
[All CAMS-FCI Questions]

An unusual spike in activity has occurred for a customer who is a supplier of aviation parts to a military force. The customer's current line of business is consistent with the banks records, and no adverse media hits have occurred. Which is the best reason for an investigator to continue an investigation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The best reason for an investigator to continue an investigation is that the end-user is a military force. This is because supplying aviation parts to a military force may involve sanctions risk, export control risk, or human rights risk, depending on the nature and destination of the military force. The investigator should conduct further due diligence to determine if the customer is complying with the relevant laws and regulations, and if the bank is exposed to any reputational or legal risk by providing services to the customer.


Former Airline Employee and Aircraft Part Sellers Charged in Kickback ...

Former Airline Employee and Aircraft Part Sellers Charged in Kickback ...

Former airline employee and aircraft part sellers charged in kickback ...

by Tyisha at Apr 04, 2025, 01:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS-FCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Willetta
6 months ago
Not sure if just being a supplier is enough reason to investigate further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
6 months ago
Wait, why is that surprising? Military contracts can be sketchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
6 months ago
No adverse media hits? Seems fine to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
6 months ago
The end-user is a military force.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
7 months ago
I agree, that definitely raises red flags.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
7 months ago
I think option D makes sense since the consistency with bank records usually indicates legitimacy, but the spike in activity still seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the nature of the business was key. I feel like option C could be significant, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the absence of adverse media hits (option B) could actually suggest there's nothing suspicious going on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
7 months ago
I remember discussing how military connections can raise red flags, so option A might be the best reason to investigate further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
8 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The military connection seems like the most compelling reason to continue the investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
8 months ago
I've got a strategy - I'll carefully consider each option and try to identify the one that best aligns with the need to continue the investigation despite the lack of adverse media hits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key seems to be identifying the best reason to continue the investigation, even though the customer's current business is consistent with the bank's records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. The question seems to be testing our understanding of when to continue an investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
8 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different factors carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the investigator is just looking for an excuse to order a fancy steak dinner on the company dime. Option A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Cherilyn
12 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option A is the most compelling reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
12 months ago
D) The current line of business is consistent with the bank's records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
12 months ago
True, but I still think option A is the best reason to continue the investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
12 months ago
B) There are no adverse media hits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 year ago
Haha, that investigator must really love steak dinners!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
1 year ago
A) The end-user is a military force.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
1 year ago
Aviation parts to a military force? That's a red flag if I ever saw one. Definitely option A for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
1 year ago
Consistent with the bank's records? Hmm, that's a good sign, but I'm still leaning towards option A.
upvoted 0 times
Skye
1 year ago
Option A is a key factor to look into, it could reveal more about the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 year ago
Option A makes sense, it's important to consider the end-user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
1 year ago
Option A) The end-user is a military force.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
1 year ago
No adverse media hits? That's great, but I'm still not convinced. I'd dig a little deeper with option C.
upvoted 0 times
Ludivina
1 year ago
User 4: True, but focusing on the customer's line of business might reveal more information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 year ago
User 3: But the fact that there are no adverse media hits is also a good sign, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, that does seem like a valid reason to dig deeper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should continue investigating because the customer is a supplier of aviation parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilda
1 year ago
I see your points, but I think the current line of business being consistent with the bank's records is the key factor here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the fact that the customer is a supplier of aviation parts is the most important reason to investigate further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
1 year ago
The military connection is a bit suspicious, don't you think? I'd go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
Shawn
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I think we should continue the investigation because the end-user is a military force.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, the military connection is definitely suspicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herminia
1 year ago
I think the best reason to continue the investigation is because the end-user is a military force.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel