Acams CAMS-FCI Exam - Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS-FCI exam

Question #: 14
Topic #: 3

An unusual spike in activity has occurred for a customer who is a supplier of aviation parts to a military force. The customer's current line of business is consistent with the banks records, and no adverse media hits have occurred. Which is the best reason for an investigator to continue an investigation?

AThe end-user is a military force.

BThere are no adverse media hits.

CThe customer is a supplier of aviation parts.

DThe current line of business is consistent with the bank's records.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The best reason for an investigator to continue an investigation is that the end-user is a military force. This is because supplying aviation parts to a military force may involve sanctions risk, export control risk, or human rights risk, depending on the nature and destination of the military force. The investigator should conduct further due diligence to determine if the customer is complying with the relevant laws and regulations, and if the bank is exposed to any reputational or legal risk by providing services to the customer.

Former Airline Employee and Aircraft Part Sellers Charged in Kickback ...

Former airline employee and aircraft part sellers charged in kickback ...

by Tyisha at Apr 04, 2025, 01:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS-FCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Willetta

4 months ago

Not sure if just being a supplier is enough reason to investigate further.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

4 months ago

Wait, why is that surprising? Military contracts can be sketchy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

5 months ago

No adverse media hits? Seems fine to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marva

5 months ago

The end-user is a military force.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

5 months ago

I agree, that definitely raises red flags.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

5 months ago

I think option D makes sense since the consistency with bank records usually indicates legitimacy, but the spike in activity still seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleta

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question where the nature of the business was key. I feel like option C could be significant, but I'm not completely confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

6 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think the absence of adverse media hits (option B) could actually suggest there's nothing suspicious going on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

6 months ago

I remember discussing how military connections can raise red flags, so option A might be the best reason to investigate further.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosina

6 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. The military connection seems like the most compelling reason to continue the investigation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

6 months ago

I've got a strategy - I'll carefully consider each option and try to identify the one that best aligns with the need to continue the investigation despite the lack of adverse media hits.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brynn

7 months ago

Okay, let's see. The key seems to be identifying the best reason to continue the investigation, even though the customer's current business is consistent with the bank's records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. The question seems to be testing our understanding of when to continue an investigation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

7 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different factors carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

12 months ago

Haha, I bet the investigator is just looking for an excuse to order a fancy steak dinner on the company dime. Option A all the way!

upvoted 0 times

Cherilyn

10 months ago

I see your point, but I still think option A is the most compelling reason.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

10 months ago

D) The current line of business is consistent with the bank's records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaynell

10 months ago

True, but I still think option A is the best reason to continue the investigation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquita

10 months ago

B) There are no adverse media hits.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

11 months ago

Haha, that investigator must really love steak dinners!

upvoted 0 times

...

Leandro

11 months ago

A) The end-user is a military force.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryan

12 months ago

Aviation parts to a military force? That's a red flag if I ever saw one. Definitely option A for me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mi

12 months ago

Consistent with the bank's records? Hmm, that's a good sign, but I'm still leaning towards option A.

upvoted 0 times

Skye

11 months ago

Option A is a key factor to look into, it could reveal more about the situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

11 months ago

Option A makes sense, it's important to consider the end-user.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lakeesha

12 months ago

Option A) The end-user is a military force.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

1 year ago

No adverse media hits? That's great, but I'm still not convinced. I'd dig a little deeper with option C.

upvoted 0 times

Ludivina

11 months ago

User 4: True, but focusing on the customer's line of business might reveal more information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wynell

11 months ago

User 3: But the fact that there are no adverse media hits is also a good sign, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

11 months ago

User 2: Agreed, that does seem like a valid reason to dig deeper.

upvoted 0 times

...

Socorro

12 months ago

User 1: I think we should continue investigating because the customer is a supplier of aviation parts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilda

1 year ago

I see your points, but I think the current line of business being consistent with the bank's records is the key factor here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the fact that the customer is a supplier of aviation parts is the most important reason to investigate further.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleni

1 year ago

The military connection is a bit suspicious, don't you think? I'd go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

Shawn

12 months ago

User 2: Yeah, I think we should continue the investigation because the end-user is a military force.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

1 year ago

User 1: I agree, the military connection is definitely suspicious.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

1 year ago

I think the best reason to continue the investigation is because the end-user is a military force.

upvoted 0 times

...