Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams Exam CAMS-FCI Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS-FCI exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 3
[All CAMS-FCI Questions]

An unusual spike in activity has occurred for a customer who is a supplier of aviation parts to a military force. The customer's current line of business is consistent with the banks records, and no adverse media hits have occurred. Which is the best reason for an investigator to continue an investigation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The best reason for an investigator to continue an investigation is that the end-user is a military force. This is because supplying aviation parts to a military force may involve sanctions risk, export control risk, or human rights risk, depending on the nature and destination of the military force. The investigator should conduct further due diligence to determine if the customer is complying with the relevant laws and regulations, and if the bank is exposed to any reputational or legal risk by providing services to the customer.


Former Airline Employee and Aircraft Part Sellers Charged in Kickback ...

Former Airline Employee and Aircraft Part Sellers Charged in Kickback ...

Former airline employee and aircraft part sellers charged in kickback ...

by Tyisha at Apr 04, 2025, 01:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS-FCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Antonio
16 days ago
Haha, I bet the investigator is just looking for an excuse to order a fancy steak dinner on the company dime. Option A all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
27 days ago
Aviation parts to a military force? That's a red flag if I ever saw one. Definitely option A for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
1 months ago
Consistent with the bank's records? Hmm, that's a good sign, but I'm still leaning towards option A.
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
9 days ago
Option A makes sense, it's important to consider the end-user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
18 days ago
Option A) The end-user is a military force.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
1 months ago
No adverse media hits? That's great, but I'm still not convinced. I'd dig a little deeper with option C.
upvoted 0 times
Ludivina
2 days ago
User 4: True, but focusing on the customer's line of business might reveal more information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
8 days ago
User 3: But the fact that there are no adverse media hits is also a good sign, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
15 days ago
User 2: Agreed, that does seem like a valid reason to dig deeper.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
27 days ago
User 1: I think we should continue investigating because the customer is a supplier of aviation parts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilda
2 months ago
I see your points, but I think the current line of business being consistent with the bank's records is the key factor here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the fact that the customer is a supplier of aviation parts is the most important reason to investigate further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
2 months ago
The military connection is a bit suspicious, don't you think? I'd go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
Shawn
20 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I think we should continue the investigation because the end-user is a military force.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, the military connection is definitely suspicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herminia
2 months ago
I think the best reason to continue the investigation is because the end-user is a military force.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel