Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Acams Exam CAMS-FCI Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS-FCI exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 3
[All CAMS-FCI Questions]

In a SAR/STR narrative concerning Individual

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the use of large amounts of cash is a common method for money launderers to move illicit funds [1]. Purchasing luxury items with cash can indicate an attempt to convert illegal funds into tangible assets that can be easily resold or moved across borders. As a result, businesses that deal with luxury items are required to implement enhanced due diligence measures, including monitoring transactions involving large amounts of cash [1].


by Clay at Mar 19, 2025, 08:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAMS-FCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
King
1 months ago
Option A all the way! Stating the specific details about the wires and the amount is definitely a product of analysis rather than a judgment or fact. The other options are just too vague.
upvoted 0 times
Belen
1 days ago
User 2: I agree, it provides concrete information that can be analyzed further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 days ago
User 3: Yeah, the other options seem more like assumptions rather than actual findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
2 days ago
User 2: I agree, it provides concrete information rather than speculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
3 days ago
User 1: Option A all the way! Stating the specific details about the wires and the amount is definitely a product of analysis rather than a judgment or fact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
13 days ago
User 1: Option A all the way! Stating the specific details about the wires and the amount is definitely a product of analysis rather than a judgment or fact.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
2 months ago
I'm torn between B and C. They both seem to be indicating structured cash deposits, which could be a sign of potential money laundering. But I guess option A is the one that's more clearly a product of analysis.
upvoted 0 times
Jenise
13 days ago
B) Individual A made structured cash deposits possibly to circumvent regulatory reporting requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
28 days ago
A) Individual A was the originator of nine wires totaling 225.000 USD between January and March 2020.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerlene
2 months ago
But A seems like a fact, not a product of analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
2 months ago
Option D is quite humorous. A college student working part-time at a car wash making structured cash deposits? That's a pretty specific and unlikely scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Rebecka
15 days ago
A) Individual A was the originator of nine wires totaling 225.000 USD between January and March 2020.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
24 days ago
C) Individual A made structured cash deposits on almost consecutive days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 months ago
B) Individual A made structured cash deposits possibly to circumvent regulatory reporting requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
1 months ago
A) Individual A was the originator of nine wires totaling 225.000 USD between January and March 2020.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keneth
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer as it presents a product of analysis rather than a fact or judgment. The other options seem to be more focused on making judgments or stating facts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
2 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel