Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Acams CAMS-FCI Exam - Topic 1 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acams's CAMS-FCI exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 1
[All CAMS-FCI Questions]

SAR/STR NARRATIVE

A SAR/STR has been submitted on five transactions conducted on the correspondent banking relationship with ABC Bank.

Client Information:

Remitter information: DEF Oil Resource Ltd. is the oldest member of the DEF Group. It was founded in 1977 as a general trading business with a primary focus on exports from Africa and North Americ

a. The group has business activities that span the entire energy value chain. Their core field of endeavor is centered within the oil and gas industry and its associated sub-sectors.

Beneficiary Information:

As per the response received from ABC Bank, it was determined that the beneficiaries are related to DEF Oil Resource Ltd. These were created by DEF Oil Resource Ltd. to purchase property in a foreign country on behalf of their senior management as part of a bonus scheme. The purpose behind this payment was for purchase of property in another country.

Payment Reference:

ABCXXXXX31PZFG2H

ABCXXXXXX51PQGEH

ABCXXXXXX214QWVG

ABCXXXXXX41PSXA2

ABCXXXXXX815QWS3

Concerns:

* We are unsure about the country of incorporation of the beneficiaries.

* We are concerned about the transactional activity since the payment made towards entities (conducted on behalf of individuals) appears to be possible tax evasion.

* There appears to be an attempt to conceal the identity of individuals (senior management), which again raises concerns about the source of funds.

* Referring to the response received from ABC Bank, we are unclear about the ultimate beneficiary of funds.

* The remitter is involved in a high-risk business, (i.e., oil and crude products trading), and the beneficiary is involved in a real estate business which again poses a higher risk.

The monitoring system of the correspondent institution flags the transaction as suspicious activity. The correspondent bank needs to send a request for information to the respondent bank. Which elements should be included in the request? (Select Three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, E

The request for information should include the following elements:

Details of DEF Oil Resource Ltd parent company and the name(s) of the beneficial owner(s) (Option A): This is necessary to verify the identity and ownership structure of the remitter and to assess the risk level of the customer and the transaction.

The account profile of the customer and their KYC data (Option C): This is necessary to understand the nature and purpose of the customer's business relationship with the respondent bank and to compare it with the observed transactional activity.

The contract pertaining to the purchase of property in another country (Option E): This is necessary to verify the legitimacy and source of funds for the transaction and to identify the ultimate beneficiary of funds.

The other options are not relevant or necessary for the request for information. The full transaction history of the correspondent bank's customer (Option B) is too broad and may not be related to suspicious activity. The respondent bank's customer's senior management bonus plan (Option D) is not relevant to the transaction and may not be available to the respondent bank. The last 6 months of transactional history (Option F) is also too broad and may not be related to the suspicious activity.


Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification Handbook, page 19

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jamey
19 days ago
The bonus plan sounds like it could provide insight into the transactions, but I wonder if it’s really necessary to include that in the request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
24 days ago
I think we might need the KYC data for the customer, but I’m not confident if it’s the most important element in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
29 days ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the full transaction history might be relevant too. It could help us understand the patterns better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
1 month ago
I remember we discussed the importance of knowing the beneficial owners in our last practice session. I think option A could be crucial here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel