During the ongoing due diligence process the company becomes aware that the customer is holding personal assets for a politically exposed person (PEP). What should the auditor recommend to enhance the control environment for this customer relationship? (Select Three.)
Suggested Answer: C, D, E
Get Premium Advanced-CAMS-Audit Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
LU
Ludivina
2 months ago
E is important for transparency. We need to know what assets are held.
LA
Laura
2 months ago
Agreed, but D is crucial too. We can't overlook ongoing monitoring.
LA
Laurel
3 months ago
I think we should definitely go with C. PEPs need extra attention.
KA
Kara
3 months ago
Automated tools are key for keeping KYC info accurate!
LA
Lanie
3 months ago
Not sure if reviewing every two years is enough for PEPs.
AG
Agustin
3 months ago
Designating as a PEP-account is a must, higher risks involved.
AL
Alona
3 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention filing a suspicious activity report first!
JO
Jody
4 months ago
Definitely agree on enhanced due diligence for PEPs!
CH
Chana
4 months ago
Reviewing the asset-holding arrangement sounds important, but I wonder if it’s as critical as the ongoing monitoring for PEPs.
KI
Kimbery
4 months ago
I’m a bit uncertain about filing a suspicious activity report; it seems like a reactive measure rather than a proactive control enhancement.
TA
Tawanna
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about enhanced due diligence for high-risk customers, so I feel confident that option D is definitely necessary here.
JO
Josephine
4 months ago
I think designating the account as a PEP-account is crucial since it triggers more scrutiny, but I'm not sure if that alone is enough.