Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Acams Advanced-CAMS-Audit Exam - Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Posted by Louann on May 12, 2026 at 06:30 PM

Which should the external auditor recommend to ensure that the institution did not facilitate transactions involving a sanctioned person?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium Advanced-CAMS-Audit Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
MI
Mirta 2 days ago
D helps prevent future issues. Keeping lists updated is vital.
BE
Bernardo 7 days ago
A ensures we catch everything missed. Compliance is crucial.
LA
Laurel 12 days ago
I feel option C is too limited. It only looks at past lists.
MA
Matthew 17 days ago
Option B makes sense too. Security assessments are important.
AI
Ailene 23 days ago
I prefer option D. Regular monitoring is key.
FA
Fausto 28 days ago
I think option A is the best. It covers all transactions.
CL
Claribel 1 month ago
D is practical. Keeping lists updated avoids future issues.
EV
Eveline 1 month ago
A ensures we catch everything missed. It's thorough.
CH
Cheryll 1 month ago
B is crucial for future prevention. We need timely updates.
TA
Tammi 2 months ago
C seems reasonable too, but it only looks back at active lists.
JO
Johnna 2 months ago
I prefer D. Regular monitoring is key to staying compliant.
MA
Margurite 2 months ago
I think option A is the best. It covers all transactions during the lapse.
LA
Laquita 2 months ago
B) could help prevent this from happening again, but is it enough?
DE
Dean 2 months ago
Wait, how did they not upload the lists in the first place?
JA
Janella 2 months ago
Totally agree with A), better safe than sorry!
KA
Kattie 3 months ago
I disagree, D) is more proactive for future compliance.
LI
Lisbeth 3 months ago
A) seems like the safest bet to catch any missed transactions.
LE
Lettie 3 months ago
Totally agree with A), we can't afford any slip-ups!
KI
Kizzy 3 months ago
C) seems risky, what if the lists were outdated?
TE
Terina 3 months ago
B) makes sense, but how often do they really update those lists?
CE
Cecily 4 months ago
I think D) is more practical for ongoing monitoring.
ER
Ernest 4 months ago
A) is definitely the safest bet for compliance.
CH
Christiane 4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m a bit confused about whether it’s better to focus on the time when the lists weren’t uploaded or just to monitor the current lists.
MI
Mila 4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question about sanctions compliance, and I think re-screening all transactions is crucial to identify any violations.
SA
Samira 4 months ago
I think option D makes sense because it emphasizes ongoing monitoring, but I wonder if it’s enough on its own without re-screening past transactions.
MY
Myra 6 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of re-screening transactions, but I'm not sure if it should be based on the current lists or the ones that were active at the time.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel