Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AAFM GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Exam - Topic 7 Question 92 Discussion

Deduction under section 80QQB is allowed in respect of royalty income to:
B) an individual who is resident in India and who is an author of a book
A) an individual who is an author of a book
C) an individual who is resident in India who is either an author of a book or a joint author of the book
D) None of These

AAFM GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Exam - Topic 7 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for AAFM's GLO_CWM_LVL_1 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 7
[All GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Questions]

Deduction under section 80QQB is allowed in respect of royalty income to:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Michael at Sep 19, 2024, 07:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Quinn
9 months ago
Wait, can it really be none of these? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
10 months ago
Agree with C, more inclusive for authors!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
10 months ago
Surprised it's not just A, seems too limiting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
10 months ago
I think it's actually C, covers joint authors too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
10 months ago
Definitely B, authors need that support!
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
11 months ago
I thought it was just for individuals who are authors, but now I'm confused about the residency requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
11 months ago
I feel like option C sounds right, but I can't recall if it specifically mentions joint authors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
11 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think it was about authors being residents in India to qualify for the deduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
11 months ago
I think section 80QQB is specifically about authors, but I'm not sure if residency matters for the deduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
11 months ago
The question is testing my knowledge of tax deductions, which is an important topic. I'll make sure to review this section thoroughly before the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
11 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer. It's about who can claim deduction for royalty income, and the key is that the individual has to be a resident of India.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the specifics of section 80QQB. Let me re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I can figure it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the options. I'll need to think through each one to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The question mentions 3% and 2.5% of profit, but I'm not sure which one the company recognizes. I'll need to re-read and make sure I understand the difference between the two percentages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
Option C is the winner! I guess the tax authorities want to encourage book writing in India, as long as you're a resident. Looks like I need to get my pen and paper ready.
upvoted 0 times
Cecilia
1 year ago
Definitely, it's a win-win situation for both authors and the literary community.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
1 year ago
I think it's a good incentive for authors to continue writing and publishing books.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
Yes, it's great to see the government supporting creativity through tax deductions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most beneficial for authors in India.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
1 year ago
Ha! This reminds me of that time I tried to write a book and ended up with a blank page. Clearly, I'm no author. But for those who are, option C seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Clement
1 year ago
Yeah, it's good that the deduction is available for both individual authors and joint authors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems to cover both scenarios for authors.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is C) an individual who is resident in India who is either an author of a book or a joint author of the book.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
1 year ago
I agree with Casie, because the deduction under section 80QQB is specifically for authors who are residents in India.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I was leaning towards option B, but C makes more sense. As long as the individual is a resident of India and an author or co-author, they should be eligible for the deduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 year ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The question specifically mentions royalty income, and section 80QQB allows deduction for individuals who are resident in India and either authors or joint authors of a book.
upvoted 0 times
Earnestine
1 year ago
I think we can confidently go with option C as the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but it does seem like option C covers all the necessary conditions for deduction under section 80QQB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
1 year ago
Yes, I think so too. It makes sense based on the criteria mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most accurate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casie
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) an individual who is resident in India and who is an author of a book.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel