AAFM CWM_LEVEL_2 Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for AAFM's CWM_LEVEL_2 exam

Question #: 12
Topic #: 1

Section C (4 Mark)

Read the senario and answer to the question.

Nimita had invested Rs. 3 lakh on 2nd May 2004 in an Equity MF when the NAV was Rs. 12.58 per unit she opted for divided payout option and received dividends paid by the scheme at 12% each on 18th Aug 2004, 20th Nov 2005, 15th Apr 2007 and on 16th Jun 2008, the dividend cum NAV per unit was Rs. 12.95, Rs. 13.05, Rs. 13.99, and Rs. 14.68 and the latest NAV of the fund is Rs. 16.68 per unit. Nimita wants to know the rate of return she got on this investment. The same is ________. (Please ignore charges and taxes if applicable)

A12.36% p.a.

B4.88% p.a.

C11.48% p.a.

D-10.78% p.a.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Regenia at May 04, 2022, 09:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWM_LEVEL_2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ruth

4 months ago

I agree, 11.48% seems reasonable based on those numbers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casey

5 months ago

Wait, did she really get 12% dividends each time? Sounds too good!

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

5 months ago

No way it's -10.78%, that seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shantay

5 months ago

I think the return is closer to 12.36% p.a.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margart

5 months ago

Looks like a solid investment, NAV has grown!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tula

5 months ago

This question is testing my knowledge of the technical details, but I'll do my best to work through it step-by-step and eliminate the incorrect options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyndia

5 months ago

This seems straightforward enough. I'm pretty confident that option B is the recommended approach from Cisco - defining the vHBAs as bootable and leaving the default values on the target definition. That should meet the requirement of mapping the WWPN to a unique LUN.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronny

5 months ago

The Copy environment feature sounds like the way to go here. It should allow me to create an identical UAT environment without too much hassle. I'll make sure to double-check the details, but I think that's the best solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jonell

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think option B makes the most sense since it talks about the risk of sensitive data exposure if the communication gets compromised.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rocco

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards B. The endpoint can be any of the nodes of the Alfresco Process Services cluster, which seems like a flexible and reliable option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions minimizing costs, so I'm not sure if Intune would be the most cost-effective option. Maybe I should consider the other choices as well.

upvoted 0 times

...