Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AACE International CCP Exam - Topic 5 Question 1 Discussion

Posted by Eun on Aug 27, 2024 at 01:52 PM

When using a fixed-price./lump-sum contract, which of the following; situations can a payment be made for the adjustment of fluctuations in the cost of of construction resources?

Suggested Answer: C

In a fixed-price/lump-sum contract, the agreed price is fixed and generally not subject to adjustment based on fluctuations in costs, unless explicitly stated in the contract terms. Payment for adjustments in construction costs due to fluctuations in resource prices or delays is typically not allowed unless there is a specific provision for such adjustments, which is rare in fixed-price contracts. Therefore, the correct answer is C. In no situation.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form


Get Premium CCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
DO
Dominic 11 months ago
No way it's C. There are always exceptions in contracts!
BA
Barrett 11 months ago
Wait, can you really adjust for costs like that? Seems odd!
TE
Tequila 11 months ago
B is a common situation, but I don't think it applies here.
BR
Britt 12 months ago
A makes sense too, but it depends on the methodology.
NU
Nu 12 months ago
I think it's D for sure. Costs outside anyone's control should be covered.
AV
Avery 1 year ago
I lean towards option C, as I recall that fixed-price contracts are meant to be firm, so adjustments might not be allowed at all.
HO
Hoa 1 year ago
I feel like option A could be a possibility since it refers to a methodology proposed at the tender stage, but I’m not confident.
LY
Lynna 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that discussed how fixed-price contracts usually don’t allow for adjustments unless specified.
JU
Julene 1 year ago
I think option D might be correct because it mentions costs beyond the control of either party, which seems reasonable for adjustments.
JA
Jacklyn 1 year ago
I'm confident I know the answer to this. Option D seems to be the correct choice - adjustments can be made for changes in the cost of resources that are beyond the control of the contractor or the client.
DA
Daniel 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the situations where the contract allows for adjustments to the fixed price, like changes in resource costs beyond the control of either party.
EL
Elvera 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the different scenarios where a payment adjustment might be allowed.
TO
Tom 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details about fixed-price/lump-sum contracts and when adjustments can be made.
SA
Santos 1 year ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the key requirements of Industry 4.0 and how 5G's capabilities can address them.
CA
Candida 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about the differences between OM3 and OM4 fiber optic cables. I'll need to review my notes on the core diameters to figure this one out.
VE
Veronica 2 years ago
I'll take 'Unexpected Cost Overruns' for $500, Alex. Option D is the clear winner here.
DO
Dortha 2 years ago
Ha! Good luck trying to predict construction costs these days. Option D is the only way to go if you don't want to end up broke.
BR
Brinda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dortha
D) For changes in The cost of resources beyond the control of either party
VE
Verona 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dortha
B) For changes in construction cost 'or varied works carried out beyond the original dale of completion
AN
Annice 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dortha
A) For changes in prices calculated in accordance with a methodology proposed by the contractor at tender stage.
AL
Aleisha 2 years ago
I agree with Mindy. Fluctuations in the cost of construction resources are often unpredictable, and the contract should have a provision to adjust for those changes.
NA
Na 2 years ago
↳ replying to Aleisha
D) For changes in The cost of resources beyond the control of either party
AN
Annelle 2 years ago
↳ replying to Aleisha
B) For changes in construction cost 'or varied works carried out beyond the original dale of completion
RA
Rasheeda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Aleisha
A) For changes in prices calculated in accordance with a methodology proposed by the contractor at tender stage.
MI
Mindy 2 years ago
Option D seems like the most reasonable choice. Changes in resource costs beyond the control of either party should be accounted for in a fixed-price contract.
NA
Nakita 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mindy
Option D seems like the most reasonable choice. Changes in resource costs beyond the control of either party should be accounted for in a fixed-price contract.
LA
Laticia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mindy
D) For changes in The cost of resources beyond the control of either party
TI
Timothy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mindy
B) For changes in construction cost 'or varied works carried out beyond the original dale of completion
KA
Kati 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mindy
A) For changes in prices calculated in accordance with a methodology proposed by the contractor at tender stage.
AN
Andrew 2 years ago
Hmm, that's a good point. But what about option D? Changes in cost of resources beyond anyone's control could also be a valid reason for adjustment.
CH
Chau 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B. It makes sense to adjust for varied works carried out beyond the original date of completion.
AN
Andrew 2 years ago
I think the answer is A, because the contractor proposed the methodology at tender stage.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel