MENU
In the following configuration:
Where network 3.0.0.x on each device is on a VE interface dedicated to aVCS traffic, what must you do to ensure that command ''device-context x'' always succeeds?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium A10-System-Administration Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
28 comments · newest first
NE
Nettie
10 months ago
B is a must for management access, though.
AR
Aron
11 months ago
I agree with C, but I'm surprised it's not more complicated!
FI
Filiberto
11 months ago
Wait, does that mean we need to change the ACLs too?
VE
Verdell
11 months ago
I think A might be more important here.
SH
Shawna
11 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go.
DE
Desirae
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards applying the ACL, but I’m not confident if that’s the right approach for this scenario.
PA
Pamela
12 months ago
The floating IP configuration sounds familiar; I feel like it could be crucial for ensuring command success.
WE
Weldon
12 months ago
I remember a practice question about enabling SSH on interfaces, but I can't recall if it was specifically for aVCS traffic.
NO
Nohemi
1 year ago
I think we might need to verify the interface is untagged, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only requirement.
TY
Ty
1 year ago
Hmm, configuring a VCS floating-IP on the 3.0.0.0/24 network could be the solution. That might help ensure the "device-context x" command works consistently across the devices.
AL
Alaine
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Should we be enabling SSH management service on that interface, or is that not necessary? I'll need to review the options carefully.
BE
Bettina
1 year ago
Ah, I think I know the answer here. We need to make sure the interface is untagged, that way the "device-context x" command can access the VCS traffic without any issues.
BO
Bong
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The key seems to be ensuring the VE interface is properly configured for the VCS traffic on network 3.0.0.x. I'll need to double-check the interface settings on each device.
DO
Dorsey
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the configuration and think through the requirements to ensure the "device-context x" command always succeeds.
DE
Derick
1 year ago
Forget the command, I'm more interested in the 'VE interface dedicated to aVCS traffic'. Sounds like a secret society of networking ninjas!
EN
Ena
1 year ago
User4: I bet only the elite networking ninjas have access to those interfaces.
ER
Ernie
1 year ago
User3: Maybe it's where they discuss top-secret networking protocols.
LA
Lawana
1 year ago
User2: I wonder what kind of traffic they're handling on those VE interfaces.
LO
Lovetta
1 year ago
User1: It does sound mysterious, like a hidden network club.
LA
Lajuana
1 year ago
I'm torn between B and C. Maybe I should just 'roll the dice' and hope for the best. What could possibly go wrong?
SH
Shantell
1 year ago
Option D is the right choice. Applying an ACL to permit the 3.0.0.0/24 network on that interface should do the trick.
WH
Whitney
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, applying an ACL to permit the 3.0.0.0/24 network on that interface is the way to go.
RE
Reta
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D is the best choice.
HY
Hyun
1 year ago
I'd go with Option B. Enabling management SSH on that interface for each device seems like a sensible way to ensure the command works consistently.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Configuring a VCS floating-IP on the 3.0.0.0/24 network should ensure the 'device-context x' command always succeeds.
EL
Elvera
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to restrict access with ACLs.
JE
Jerlene
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Apply acl 'permit 3.0.0.0 /24' on that interface for each device.
EL
Elvera
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Enable management service ssh on that interface for each device.